From: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
To: bsegall@google.com
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com>,
Chegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@hp.com>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>,
pjt@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Reduce contention in update_cfs_rq_blocked_load
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 14:27:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1407187656.11985.20.camel@j-VirtualBox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xm264mxsugds.fsf@sword-of-the-dawn.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 13:52 -0700, bsegall@google.com wrote:
> Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com> writes:
>
> > When running workloads on 2+ socket systems, based on perf profiles, the
> > update_cfs_rq_blocked_load function constantly shows up as taking up a
> > noticeable % of run time. This is especially apparent on an 8 socket
> > machine. For example, when running the AIM7 custom workload, we see:
> >
> > 4.18% reaim [kernel.kallsyms] [k] update_cfs_rq_blocked_load
> >
> > Much of the contention is in __update_cfs_rq_tg_load_contrib when we
> > update the tg load contribution stats. However, it turns out that in many
> > cases, they don't need to be updated and "tg_contrib" is 0.
> >
> > This patch adds a check in __update_cfs_rq_tg_load_contrib to skip updating
> > tg load contribution stats when nothing needs to be updated. This reduces the
> > cacheline contention that would be unnecessary. In the above case, with the
> > patch, perf reports the total time spent in this function went down by more
> > than a factor of 3x:
> >
> > 1.18% reaim [kernel.kallsyms] [k] update_cfs_rq_blocked_load
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
>
> That said, it might be better to remove force_update for this function,
> or make it just reduce the minimum to /64 or something. If the test is
> easy to run it would be good to see what it's like just removing the
> force_update param for this function to see if it's worth worrying
> about or if the zero case catches ~all the perf gain.
Sure, I can test that out too. I did notice when running another AIM7
workload that !zero was the more common case, so this has the potential
to further reduce contention.
> Paul, your thoughts?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-04 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-04 20:28 [PATCH] sched: Reduce contention in update_cfs_rq_blocked_load Jason Low
2014-08-04 19:15 ` Yuyang Du
2014-08-04 21:42 ` Yuyang Du
2014-08-05 15:42 ` Jason Low
2014-08-06 18:21 ` Jason Low
2014-08-07 18:02 ` Yuyang Du
2014-08-08 4:18 ` Jason Low
2014-08-07 22:30 ` Yuyang Du
2014-08-08 7:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-07 23:15 ` Yuyang Du
2014-08-08 0:02 ` Yuyang Du
2014-08-04 20:52 ` bsegall
2014-08-04 21:27 ` Jason Low [this message]
2014-08-11 17:31 ` Jason Low
2014-08-04 21:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-05 17:53 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1407187656.11985.20.camel@j-VirtualBox \
--to=jason.low2@hp.com \
--cc=Waiman.Long@hp.com \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=chegu_vinod@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).