From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753099AbaHDV1k (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2014 17:27:40 -0400 Received: from g4t3427.houston.hp.com ([15.201.208.55]:38726 "EHLO g4t3427.houston.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751998AbaHDV1i (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2014 17:27:38 -0400 Message-ID: <1407187656.11985.20.camel@j-VirtualBox> Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Reduce contention in update_cfs_rq_blocked_load From: Jason Low To: bsegall@google.com Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Waiman Long , Mel Gorman , Mike Galbraith , Rik van Riel , Aswin Chandramouleeswaran , Chegu Vinod , Scott J Norton , pjt@google.com Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 14:27:36 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <1407184118.11407.11.camel@j-VirtualBox> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 13:52 -0700, bsegall@google.com wrote: > Jason Low writes: > > > When running workloads on 2+ socket systems, based on perf profiles, the > > update_cfs_rq_blocked_load function constantly shows up as taking up a > > noticeable % of run time. This is especially apparent on an 8 socket > > machine. For example, when running the AIM7 custom workload, we see: > > > > 4.18% reaim [kernel.kallsyms] [k] update_cfs_rq_blocked_load > > > > Much of the contention is in __update_cfs_rq_tg_load_contrib when we > > update the tg load contribution stats. However, it turns out that in many > > cases, they don't need to be updated and "tg_contrib" is 0. > > > > This patch adds a check in __update_cfs_rq_tg_load_contrib to skip updating > > tg load contribution stats when nothing needs to be updated. This reduces the > > cacheline contention that would be unnecessary. In the above case, with the > > patch, perf reports the total time spent in this function went down by more > > than a factor of 3x: > > > > 1.18% reaim [kernel.kallsyms] [k] update_cfs_rq_blocked_load > > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Low > Reviewed-by: Ben Segall > > That said, it might be better to remove force_update for this function, > or make it just reduce the minimum to /64 or something. If the test is > easy to run it would be good to see what it's like just removing the > force_update param for this function to see if it's worth worrying > about or if the zero case catches ~all the perf gain. Sure, I can test that out too. I did notice when running another AIM7 workload that !zero was the more common case, so this has the potential to further reduce contention. > Paul, your thoughts?