public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Gimpelevich <daniel@gimpelevich.san-francisco.ca.us>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Wireless" 
	<linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] allow setting wiphy.perm_addr after driver probe
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 17:01:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1407801666.28221.84.camel@chimera> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52896C9C-8560-4CE4-A1FB-C896D766EC87@holtmann.org>

On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 16:56 -0700, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> the way I read the nl80211 code is that the NL80211_CMD_NEW_INTERFACE
> requires a wiphy device to be specified. And that is actually just a
> number. So I have no idea what the MAC has to here.
> 
OpenWrt finds a wiphy by its MAC.

> Why does the wiphy need to know the MAC if it is always specified from
> userspace when actually creating the new netdev interface. Works for
> P2P devices, so why wouldn't it work for access point and station
> mode?
> 
A MAC can be specified for the netdev, but it is assigned to a wiphy
identified by its MAC.


  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-12  0:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-11 18:04 [PATCH] allow setting wiphy.perm_addr after driver probe Daniel Gimpelevich
2014-08-11 20:25 ` Marcel Holtmann
2014-08-11 20:40   ` Daniel Gimpelevich
2014-08-11 20:56     ` Marcel Holtmann
2014-08-11 21:04       ` Daniel Gimpelevich
2014-08-11 22:41         ` Marcel Holtmann
2014-08-11 23:12           ` Daniel Gimpelevich
2014-08-11 23:56             ` Marcel Holtmann
2014-08-12  0:01               ` Daniel Gimpelevich [this message]
2014-08-12  7:59                 ` Marcel Holtmann
2014-08-12  8:43                   ` Jonas Gorski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1407801666.28221.84.camel@chimera \
    --to=daniel@gimpelevich.san-francisco.ca.us \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox