From: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
To: pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: gleb@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, avi.kivity@gmail.com, mtosatti@redhat.com,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] kvm: fix potentially corrupt mmio cache
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 15:46:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1408401967-27211-1-git-send-email-dmatlack@google.com> (raw)
vcpu exits and memslot mutations can run concurrently as long as the
vcpu does not aquire the slots mutex. Thus it is theoretically possible
for memslots to change underneath a vcpu that is handling an exit.
If we increment the memslot generation number again after
synchronize_srcu_expedited(), vcpus can safely cache memslot generation
without maintaining a single rcu_dereference through an entire vm exit.
And much of the x86/kvm code does not maintain a single rcu_dereference
of the current memslots during each exit.
We can prevent the following case:
vcpu (CPU 0) | thread (CPU 1)
--------------------------------------------+--------------------------
1 vm exit |
2 decide to cache something based on |
old memslots |
3 | change memslots
4 | increment generation
5 tag cache with new memslot generation |
... |
<action based on cache occurs even |
though the caching decision was based |
on the old memslots> |
... |
<action *continues* to occur until next |
memslot generation change, which may |
be never> |
By incrementing the generation again after synchronizing kvm->srcu
readers, we guarantee the generation cached in (5) will very soon
become invalid.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
---
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 4b6c01b..86d3697 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -95,8 +95,6 @@ static int hardware_enable_all(void);
static void hardware_disable_all(void);
static void kvm_io_bus_destroy(struct kvm_io_bus *bus);
-static void update_memslots(struct kvm_memslots *slots,
- struct kvm_memory_slot *new, u64 last_generation);
static void kvm_release_pfn_dirty(pfn_t pfn);
static void mark_page_dirty_in_slot(struct kvm *kvm,
@@ -685,8 +683,7 @@ static void sort_memslots(struct kvm_memslots *slots)
}
static void update_memslots(struct kvm_memslots *slots,
- struct kvm_memory_slot *new,
- u64 last_generation)
+ struct kvm_memory_slot *new)
{
if (new) {
int id = new->id;
@@ -697,8 +694,6 @@ static void update_memslots(struct kvm_memslots *slots,
if (new->npages != npages)
sort_memslots(slots);
}
-
- slots->generation = last_generation + 1;
}
static int check_memory_region_flags(struct kvm_userspace_memory_region *mem)
@@ -720,10 +715,19 @@ static struct kvm_memslots *install_new_memslots(struct kvm *kvm,
{
struct kvm_memslots *old_memslots = kvm->memslots;
- update_memslots(slots, new, kvm->memslots->generation);
+ slots->generation = old_memslots->generation + 1;
+
+ update_memslots(slots, new);
rcu_assign_pointer(kvm->memslots, slots);
synchronize_srcu_expedited(&kvm->srcu);
+ /*
+ * Increment the new memslot generation a second time. This prevents
+ * vm exits that race with memslot updates from caching a memslot
+ * generation that will (potentially) be valid forever.
+ */
+ slots->generation++;
+
kvm_arch_memslots_updated(kvm);
return old_memslots;
--
2.1.0.rc2.206.gedb03e5
next reply other threads:[~2014-08-18 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-18 22:46 David Matlack [this message]
2014-08-18 22:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] kvm: x86: fix stale mmio cache bug David Matlack
2014-08-28 21:10 ` David Matlack
2014-08-29 7:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-29 19:21 ` David Matlack
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1408401967-27211-1-git-send-email-dmatlack@google.com \
--to=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=avi.kivity@gmail.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).