From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>,
Zhang Yang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/2] KVM: nVMX: introduce apic_access_and_virtual_page_valid
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 17:45:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1408527905-11705-2-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1408527905-11705-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Introduce apic_access_and_virtual_page_valid() to check the valid
of nested apic access page and virtual apic page earlier.
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index caf239d..02bc07d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -7838,6 +7838,50 @@ static void vmx_inject_page_fault_nested(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
kvm_inject_page_fault(vcpu, fault);
}
+static bool apic_access_and_virtual_page_valid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
+{
+ struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
+
+ if (nested_cpu_has2(vmcs12, SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES)) {
+ if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(vmcs12->apic_access_addr))
+ /*TODO: Also verify bits beyond physical address width are 0*/
+ return false;
+
+ /*
+ * Translate L1 physical address to host physical
+ * address for vmcs02. Keep the page pinned, so this
+ * physical address remains valid. We keep a reference
+ * to it so we can release it later.
+ */
+ if (vmx->nested.apic_access_page) /* shouldn't happen */
+ nested_release_page(vmx->nested.apic_access_page);
+ vmx->nested.apic_access_page =
+ nested_get_page(vcpu, vmcs12->apic_access_addr);
+ }
+
+ if (nested_cpu_has(vmcs12, CPU_BASED_TPR_SHADOW)) {
+ if (vmx->nested.virtual_apic_page) /* shouldn't happen */
+ nested_release_page(vmx->nested.virtual_apic_page);
+ vmx->nested.virtual_apic_page =
+ nested_get_page(vcpu, vmcs12->virtual_apic_page_addr);
+
+ /*
+ * Failing the vm entry is _not_ what the processor does
+ * but it's basically the only possibility we have.
+ * We could still enter the guest if CR8 load exits are
+ * enabled, CR8 store exits are enabled, and virtualize APIC
+ * access is disabled; in this case the processor would never
+ * use the TPR shadow and we could simply clear the bit from
+ * the execution control. But such a configuration is useless,
+ * so let's keep the code simple.
+ */
+ if (!vmx->nested.virtual_apic_page)
+ return false;
+ }
+ return true;
+}
+
static void vmx_start_preemption_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
u64 preemption_timeout = get_vmcs12(vcpu)->vmx_preemption_timer_value;
@@ -7984,16 +8028,6 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
if (exec_control & SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES) {
/*
- * Translate L1 physical address to host physical
- * address for vmcs02. Keep the page pinned, so this
- * physical address remains valid. We keep a reference
- * to it so we can release it later.
- */
- if (vmx->nested.apic_access_page) /* shouldn't happen */
- nested_release_page(vmx->nested.apic_access_page);
- vmx->nested.apic_access_page =
- nested_get_page(vcpu, vmcs12->apic_access_addr);
- /*
* If translation failed, no matter: This feature asks
* to exit when accessing the given address, and if it
* can never be accessed, this feature won't do
@@ -8040,30 +8074,8 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
exec_control |= vmcs12->cpu_based_vm_exec_control;
if (exec_control & CPU_BASED_TPR_SHADOW) {
- if (vmx->nested.virtual_apic_page)
- nested_release_page(vmx->nested.virtual_apic_page);
- vmx->nested.virtual_apic_page =
- nested_get_page(vcpu, vmcs12->virtual_apic_page_addr);
- if (!vmx->nested.virtual_apic_page)
- exec_control &=
- ~CPU_BASED_TPR_SHADOW;
- else
- vmcs_write64(VIRTUAL_APIC_PAGE_ADDR,
+ vmcs_write64(VIRTUAL_APIC_PAGE_ADDR,
page_to_phys(vmx->nested.virtual_apic_page));
-
- /*
- * Failing the vm entry is _not_ what the processor does
- * but it's basically the only possibility we have.
- * We could still enter the guest if CR8 load exits are
- * enabled, CR8 store exits are enabled, and virtualize APIC
- * access is disabled; in this case the processor would never
- * use the TPR shadow and we could simply clear the bit from
- * the execution control. But such a configuration is useless,
- * so let's keep the code simple.
- */
- if (!vmx->nested.virtual_apic_page)
- nested_vmx_failValid(vcpu, VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_CONTROL_FIELD);
-
vmcs_write32(TPR_THRESHOLD, vmcs12->tpr_threshold);
} else if (vm_need_tpr_shadow(vmx->vcpu.kvm))
vmcs_write64(VIRTUAL_APIC_PAGE_ADDR,
@@ -8230,9 +8242,7 @@ static int nested_vmx_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool launch)
return 1;
}
- if (nested_cpu_has2(vmcs12, SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES) &&
- !PAGE_ALIGNED(vmcs12->apic_access_addr)) {
- /*TODO: Also verify bits beyond physical address width are 0*/
+ if (!apic_access_and_virtual_page_valid(vcpu, vmcs12)) {
nested_vmx_failValid(vcpu, VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_CONTROL_FIELD);
return 1;
}
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-20 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-20 9:45 [PATCH v5 1/2] KVM: nVMX: nested TPR shadow/threshold emulation Wanpeng Li
2014-08-20 9:45 ` Wanpeng Li [this message]
2014-08-20 10:50 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] KVM: nVMX: introduce apic_access_and_virtual_page_valid Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-21 8:08 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-08-21 9:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1408527905-11705-2-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com \
--to=wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).