linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>,
	Zhang Yang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/2] KVM: nVMX: introduce apic_access_and_virtual_page_valid
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 17:45:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1408527905-11705-2-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1408527905-11705-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>

Introduce apic_access_and_virtual_page_valid() to check the valid 
of nested apic access page and virtual apic page earlier.

Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index caf239d..02bc07d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -7838,6 +7838,50 @@ static void vmx_inject_page_fault_nested(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 		kvm_inject_page_fault(vcpu, fault);
 }
 
+static bool apic_access_and_virtual_page_valid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+						struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
+{
+	struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
+
+	if (nested_cpu_has2(vmcs12, SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES)) {
+		if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(vmcs12->apic_access_addr))
+			/*TODO: Also verify bits beyond physical address width are 0*/
+			return false;
+
+		/*
+		 * Translate L1 physical address to host physical
+		 * address for vmcs02. Keep the page pinned, so this
+		 * physical address remains valid. We keep a reference
+		 * to it so we can release it later.
+		 */
+		if (vmx->nested.apic_access_page) /* shouldn't happen */
+			nested_release_page(vmx->nested.apic_access_page);
+		vmx->nested.apic_access_page =
+			nested_get_page(vcpu, vmcs12->apic_access_addr);
+	}
+
+	if (nested_cpu_has(vmcs12, CPU_BASED_TPR_SHADOW)) {
+		if (vmx->nested.virtual_apic_page) /* shouldn't happen */
+			nested_release_page(vmx->nested.virtual_apic_page);
+		vmx->nested.virtual_apic_page =
+			nested_get_page(vcpu, vmcs12->virtual_apic_page_addr);
+
+		/*
+		 * Failing the vm entry is _not_ what the processor does
+		 * but it's basically the only possibility we have.
+		 * We could still enter the guest if CR8 load exits are
+		 * enabled, CR8 store exits are enabled, and virtualize APIC
+		 * access is disabled; in this case the processor would never
+		 * use the TPR shadow and we could simply clear the bit from
+		 * the execution control.  But such a configuration is useless,
+		 * so let's keep the code simple.
+		 */
+		if (!vmx->nested.virtual_apic_page)
+			return false;
+	}
+	return true;
+}
+
 static void vmx_start_preemption_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	u64 preemption_timeout = get_vmcs12(vcpu)->vmx_preemption_timer_value;
@@ -7984,16 +8028,6 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
 
 		if (exec_control & SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES) {
 			/*
-			 * Translate L1 physical address to host physical
-			 * address for vmcs02. Keep the page pinned, so this
-			 * physical address remains valid. We keep a reference
-			 * to it so we can release it later.
-			 */
-			if (vmx->nested.apic_access_page) /* shouldn't happen */
-				nested_release_page(vmx->nested.apic_access_page);
-			vmx->nested.apic_access_page =
-				nested_get_page(vcpu, vmcs12->apic_access_addr);
-			/*
 			 * If translation failed, no matter: This feature asks
 			 * to exit when accessing the given address, and if it
 			 * can never be accessed, this feature won't do
@@ -8040,30 +8074,8 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
 	exec_control |= vmcs12->cpu_based_vm_exec_control;
 
 	if (exec_control & CPU_BASED_TPR_SHADOW) {
-		if (vmx->nested.virtual_apic_page)
-			nested_release_page(vmx->nested.virtual_apic_page);
-		vmx->nested.virtual_apic_page =
-		   nested_get_page(vcpu, vmcs12->virtual_apic_page_addr);
-		if (!vmx->nested.virtual_apic_page)
-			exec_control &=
-				~CPU_BASED_TPR_SHADOW;
-		else
-			vmcs_write64(VIRTUAL_APIC_PAGE_ADDR,
+		vmcs_write64(VIRTUAL_APIC_PAGE_ADDR,
 				page_to_phys(vmx->nested.virtual_apic_page));
-
-		/*
-		 * Failing the vm entry is _not_ what the processor does
-		 * but it's basically the only possibility we have.
-		 * We could still enter the guest if CR8 load exits are
-		 * enabled, CR8 store exits are enabled, and virtualize APIC
-		 * access is disabled; in this case the processor would never
-		 * use the TPR shadow and we could simply clear the bit from
-		 * the execution control.  But such a configuration is useless,
-		 * so let's keep the code simple.
-		 */
-		if (!vmx->nested.virtual_apic_page)
-			nested_vmx_failValid(vcpu, VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_CONTROL_FIELD);
-
 		vmcs_write32(TPR_THRESHOLD, vmcs12->tpr_threshold);
 	} else if (vm_need_tpr_shadow(vmx->vcpu.kvm))
 		vmcs_write64(VIRTUAL_APIC_PAGE_ADDR,
@@ -8230,9 +8242,7 @@ static int nested_vmx_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool launch)
 		return 1;
 	}
 
-	if (nested_cpu_has2(vmcs12, SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES) &&
-			!PAGE_ALIGNED(vmcs12->apic_access_addr)) {
-		/*TODO: Also verify bits beyond physical address width are 0*/
+	if (!apic_access_and_virtual_page_valid(vcpu, vmcs12)) {
 		nested_vmx_failValid(vcpu, VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_CONTROL_FIELD);
 		return 1;
 	}
-- 
1.9.1


  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-20  9:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-20  9:45 [PATCH v5 1/2] KVM: nVMX: nested TPR shadow/threshold emulation Wanpeng Li
2014-08-20  9:45 ` Wanpeng Li [this message]
2014-08-20 10:50   ` [PATCH v5 2/2] KVM: nVMX: introduce apic_access_and_virtual_page_valid Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-21  8:08     ` Wanpeng Li
2014-08-21  9:31       ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1408527905-11705-2-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com \
    --to=wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gleb@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).