From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: luca.abeni@unitn.it, rdunlap@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
henrik@austad.us, raistlin@linux.it, juri.lelli@gmail.com,
juri.lelli@arm.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: add tests suite appendix
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 10:01:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1408611700-9420-5-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1408611700-9420-1-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com>
Add an appendix briefly describing tools that can be used to test SCHED_DEADLINE
(and the scheduler in general). Links to where source code of the tools is hosted
are also provided.
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Henrik Austad <henrik@austad.us>
Cc: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
index 10fc4c4..6ca2940 100644
--- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ CONTENTS
5. Tasks CPU affinity
5.1 SCHED_DEADLINE and cpusets HOWTO
6. Future plans
+ A. Test suite
0. WARNING
@@ -339,3 +340,54 @@ CONTENTS
throttling patches [https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/23/239] but we still are in
the preliminary phases of the merge and we really seek feedback that would
help us decide on the direction it should take.
+
+Appendix A. Test suite
+======================
+
+ The SCHED_DEADLINE policy can be easily tested using two applications that
+ are part of a wider Linux Scheduler validation suite. The suite is
+ available as a GitHub repository: https://github.com/scheduler-tools.
+
+ The first testing application is called rt-app and can be used to
+ start multiple threads with specific parameters. rt-app supports
+ SCHED_{OTHER,FIFO,RR,DEADLINE} scheduling policies and their related
+ parameters (e.g., niceness, priority, runtime/deadline/period). rt-app
+ is a valuable tool, as it can be used to synthetically recreate certain
+ workloads (maybe mimicking real use-cases) and evaluate how the scheduler
+ behaves under such workloads. In this way, results are easily reproducible.
+ rt-app is available at: https://github.com/scheduler-tools/rt-app.
+
+ Thread parameters can be specified from the command line, with something like
+ this:
+
+ # rt-app -t 100000:10000:d -t 150000:20000:f:10 -D5
+
+ The above creates two threads. The first one, scheduled by SCHED_DEADLINE,
+ executes for 10ms every 100ms and the second one, scheduled at RT priority 10
+ with SCHED_FIFO, executes for 20ms every 150ms. The configuration runs
+ for 5 seconds.
+
+ More interestingly, configurations can be described with a json file that
+ can be passed as input to rt-app with something like this:
+
+ # rt-app my_config.json
+
+ The parameters that can be specified with the second method are a superset
+ of the command line options. Please refer to rt-app documentation for more
+ details.
+
+ The second testing application is a modification of schedtool, called
+ schedtool-dl, which can be used to setup SCHED_DEADLINE parameters for a
+ certain pid/application. schedtool-dl is available at:
+ https://github.com/scheduler-tools/schedtool-dl.git.
+
+ The usage is straightforward:
+
+ # schedtool -E -t 10000000:100000000 -e ./my_cpuhog_app
+
+ With this, my_cpuhog_app is put to run inside a SCHED_DEADLINE reservation
+ of 10ms every 100ms (note that parameters are expressed in microseconds).
+ You can also use schedtool to create a reservation for an already running
+ application, given that you know its pid:
+
+ # schedtool -E -t 10000000:100000000 my_app_pid
--
2.0.4
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-21 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-21 9:01 [PATCH v2 0/4] SCHED_DEADLINE documentation fixes and improvements Juri Lelli
2014-08-21 9:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: fix terminology and improve clarity Juri Lelli
2014-08-21 9:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: Rewrite section 4 intro Juri Lelli
2014-08-21 13:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-08-26 8:31 ` Juri Lelli
2014-08-21 9:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: improve and clarify AC bits Juri Lelli
2014-08-21 13:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-08-21 14:47 ` Luca Abeni
2014-08-22 8:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-08-22 20:14 ` Luca Abeni
2014-08-21 9:01 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1408611700-9420-5-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com \
--to=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=henrik@austad.us \
--cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.abeni@unitn.it \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=raistlin@linux.it \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).