From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
To: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, zatimend@hotmail.co.uk,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] random: add and use memzero_explicit() for clearing data
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 01:11:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1409008290.6274.73.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1408996899-4892-1-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com>
On Mo, 2014-08-25 at 22:01 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> zatimend has reported that in his environment (3.16/gcc4.8.3/corei7)
> memset() calls which clear out sensitive data in extract_{buf,entropy,
> entropy_user}() in random driver are being optimized away by gcc.
>
> Add a helper memzero_explicit() (similarly as explicit_bzero() variants)
> that can be used in such cases where a variable with sensitive data is
> being cleared out in the end. Other use cases might also be in crypto
> code. [ I have put this into lib/string.c though, as it's always built-in
> and doesn't need any dependencies then. ]
>
> Fixes kernel bugzilla: 82041
>
> Reported-by: zatimend@hotmail.co.uk
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
> Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
In case this pattern of important function calls getting optimized away
emerges more often we could also go with a wrapper which forces the
execution of the function, like:
--- a/include/linux/compiler.h
+++ b/include/linux/compiler.h
@@ -181,6 +181,13 @@ void ftrace_likely_update(struct ftrace_branch_data *f, int val, int expect);
#define OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(var) barrier()
#endif
+#ifndef OPTIMIZER_FORCE_CALL
+#define OPTIMIZER_FORCE_CALL(func, args...) ({ \
+ typeof(func) * volatile __func = (func); \
+ __func(args); \
+ })
+#endif
+
/* Not-quite-unique ID. */
#ifndef __UNIQUE_ID
# define __UNIQUE_ID(prefix) __PASTE(__PASTE(__UNIQUE_ID_, prefix), __LINE__)
Thanks,
Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-25 23:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-25 20:01 [PATCH] random: add and use memzero_explicit() for clearing data Daniel Borkmann
2014-08-25 20:35 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2014-08-25 20:38 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-08-25 23:11 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa [this message]
2014-08-27 3:21 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-12-01 10:27 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-12-01 11:04 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-12-01 11:29 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-12-01 11:38 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-12-01 13:39 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-12-01 11:48 ` Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1409008290.6274.73.camel@localhost \
--to=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=zatimend@hotmail.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox