From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Lu Jingchang-B35083 <jingchang.lu@freescale.com>
Cc: "mturquette@linaro.org" <mturquette@linaro.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND] clk: ppc-corenet: Add Freescale ARM-based platforms CLK_OF_DECLARE support
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 18:33:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1409182412.6510.129.camel@snotra.buserror.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <164af7b3be3747a0be3fe3a6cf83d3b1@BL2PR03MB467.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 21:19 -0500, Lu Jingchang-B35083 wrote:
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Wood Scott-B07421
> >Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 6:51 AM
> >To: Lu Jingchang-B35083
> >Cc: mturquette@linaro.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-
> >kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> >Subject: Re: [RESEND] clk: ppc-corenet: Add Freescale ARM-based platforms
> >CLK_OF_DECLARE support
> >
> >On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 17:34 +0800, Jingchang Lu wrote:
> >> +CLK_OF_DECLARE(ppc_core_pll_v1, "fsl,qoriq-core-pll-1.0",
> >core_pll_init);
> >> +CLK_OF_DECLARE(ppc_core_pll_v2, "fsl,qoriq-core-pll-2.0",
> >core_pll_init);
> >> +CLK_OF_DECLARE(ppc_core_mux_v1, "fsl,qoriq-core-mux-1.0",
> >core_mux_init);
> >> +CLK_OF_DECLARE(ppc_core_mux_v2, "fsl,qoriq-core-mux-2.0",
> >core_mux_init);
> >
> >What does this do that the existing platform driver and match table
> >don't? Why is it needed for ARM when PPC didn't need it?
> >
> >-Scott
> >
> Common clk init on ARM platform is initialized earlier via of_clk_init() instead of
> driver probe method, the of_clk_init will walk a __clk_of_table to init each clk provider
> in the table, the CLK_OF_DECLARE() macro puts a supported clk in the __clk_of_table for
> it initializing on starup, and the clk system has added some common clk such as "fixed-clk"
> to this table already.
> So here I add our specific clk init declaration to consist this framework, and the driver
> probe function will not be needed on ARM.
OK... Is there any reason why the new method won't work on PPC?
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-27 23:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-22 9:34 [RESEND] clk: ppc-corenet: Add Freescale ARM-based platforms CLK_OF_DECLARE support Jingchang Lu
2014-08-26 22:51 ` Scott Wood
2014-08-27 2:19 ` Jingchang Lu
2014-08-27 23:33 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2014-08-28 10:05 ` Jingchang Lu
2014-08-28 16:25 ` Scott Wood
2014-08-29 7:17 ` Jingchang Lu
2014-08-30 1:00 ` Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1409182412.6510.129.camel@snotra.buserror.net \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=jingchang.lu@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox