From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com,
bobby.prani@gmail.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 tip/core/rcu 16/17] rcu: Remove local_irq_disable() in rcu_preempt_note_context_switch()
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 12:20:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1409253608-32538-16-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409253608-32538-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
The rcu_preempt_note_context_switch() function is on a scheduling fast
path, so it would be good to avoid disabling irqs. The reason that irqs
are disabled is to synchronize process-level and irq-handler access to
the task_struct ->rcu_read_unlock_special bitmask. This commit therefore
makes ->rcu_read_unlock_special instead be a union of bools with a short
allowing single-access checks in RCU's __rcu_read_unlock(). This results
in the process-level and irq-handler accesses being simple loads and
stores, so that irqs need no longer be disabled. This commit therefore
removes the irq disabling from rcu_preempt_note_context_switch().
Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/init_task.h | 2 +-
include/linux/sched.h | 16 +++++++++-------
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 32 +++++++++++++++-----------------
kernel/rcu/update.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/init_task.h b/include/linux/init_task.h
index 03b274873b06..77fc43f8fb72 100644
--- a/include/linux/init_task.h
+++ b/include/linux/init_task.h
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ extern struct group_info init_groups;
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
#define INIT_TASK_RCU_PREEMPT(tsk) \
.rcu_read_lock_nesting = 0, \
- .rcu_read_unlock_special = 0, \
+ .rcu_read_unlock_special.s = 0, \
.rcu_node_entry = LIST_HEAD_INIT(tsk.rcu_node_entry), \
INIT_TASK_RCU_TREE_PREEMPT()
#else
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index ec8b34722bcc..42888d715fb1 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1212,6 +1212,13 @@ struct sched_dl_entity {
struct hrtimer dl_timer;
};
+union rcu_special {
+ struct {
+ bool blocked;
+ bool need_qs;
+ } b;
+ short s;
+};
struct rcu_node;
enum perf_event_task_context {
@@ -1264,7 +1271,7 @@ struct task_struct {
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
int rcu_read_lock_nesting;
- char rcu_read_unlock_special;
+ union rcu_special rcu_read_unlock_special;
struct list_head rcu_node_entry;
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */
#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
@@ -2005,16 +2012,11 @@ extern void task_clear_jobctl_trapping(struct task_struct *task);
extern void task_clear_jobctl_pending(struct task_struct *task,
unsigned int mask);
-#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
-#define RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BLOCKED (1 << 0) /* blocked while in RCU read-side. */
-#define RCU_READ_UNLOCK_NEED_QS (1 << 1) /* RCU core needs CPU response. */
-#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */
-
static inline void rcu_copy_process(struct task_struct *p)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
p->rcu_read_lock_nesting = 0;
- p->rcu_read_unlock_special = 0;
+ p->rcu_read_unlock_special.s = 0;
p->rcu_blocked_node = NULL;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->rcu_node_entry);
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 533d0381927f..471fc77bb146 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -155,9 +155,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_batches_completed);
* not in a quiescent state. There might be any number of tasks blocked
* while in an RCU read-side critical section.
*
- * Unlike the other rcu_*_qs() functions, callers to this function
- * must disable irqs in order to protect the assignment to
- * ->rcu_read_unlock_special.
+ * As with the other rcu_*_qs() functions, callers to this function
+ * must disable preemption.
*/
static void rcu_preempt_qs(int cpu)
{
@@ -166,7 +165,7 @@ static void rcu_preempt_qs(int cpu)
if (rdp->passed_quiesce == 0)
trace_rcu_grace_period(TPS("rcu_preempt"), rdp->gpnum, TPS("cpuqs"));
rdp->passed_quiesce = 1;
- current->rcu_read_unlock_special &= ~RCU_READ_UNLOCK_NEED_QS;
+ current->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs = false;
}
/*
@@ -190,14 +189,14 @@ static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(int cpu)
struct rcu_node *rnp;
if (t->rcu_read_lock_nesting > 0 &&
- (t->rcu_read_unlock_special & RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BLOCKED) == 0) {
+ !t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.blocked) {
/* Possibly blocking in an RCU read-side critical section. */
rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rcu_preempt_state.rda, cpu);
rnp = rdp->mynode;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
- t->rcu_read_unlock_special |= RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BLOCKED;
+ t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.blocked = true;
t->rcu_blocked_node = rnp;
/*
@@ -239,7 +238,7 @@ static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(int cpu)
: rnp->gpnum + 1);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
} else if (t->rcu_read_lock_nesting < 0 &&
- t->rcu_read_unlock_special) {
+ t->rcu_read_unlock_special.s) {
/*
* Complete exit from RCU read-side critical section on
@@ -257,9 +256,7 @@ static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(int cpu)
* grace period, then the fact that the task has been enqueued
* means that we continue to block the current grace period.
*/
- local_irq_save(flags);
rcu_preempt_qs(cpu);
- local_irq_restore(flags);
}
/*
@@ -340,7 +337,7 @@ void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
bool drop_boost_mutex = false;
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST */
struct rcu_node *rnp;
- int special;
+ union rcu_special special;
/* NMI handlers cannot block and cannot safely manipulate state. */
if (in_nmi())
@@ -350,12 +347,13 @@ void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
/*
* If RCU core is waiting for this CPU to exit critical section,
- * let it know that we have done so.
+ * let it know that we have done so. Because irqs are disabled,
+ * t->rcu_read_unlock_special cannot change.
*/
special = t->rcu_read_unlock_special;
- if (special & RCU_READ_UNLOCK_NEED_QS) {
+ if (special.b.need_qs) {
rcu_preempt_qs(smp_processor_id());
- if (!t->rcu_read_unlock_special) {
+ if (!t->rcu_read_unlock_special.s) {
local_irq_restore(flags);
return;
}
@@ -368,8 +366,8 @@ void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
}
/* Clean up if blocked during RCU read-side critical section. */
- if (special & RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BLOCKED) {
- t->rcu_read_unlock_special &= ~RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BLOCKED;
+ if (special.b.blocked) {
+ t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.blocked = false;
/*
* Remove this task from the list it blocked on. The
@@ -658,7 +656,7 @@ static void rcu_preempt_check_callbacks(int cpu)
}
if (t->rcu_read_lock_nesting > 0 &&
per_cpu(rcu_preempt_data, cpu).qs_pending)
- t->rcu_read_unlock_special |= RCU_READ_UNLOCK_NEED_QS;
+ t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs = true;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST
@@ -941,7 +939,7 @@ void exit_rcu(void)
return;
t->rcu_read_lock_nesting = 1;
barrier();
- t->rcu_read_unlock_special = RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BLOCKED;
+ t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.blocked = true;
__rcu_read_unlock();
}
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/update.c b/kernel/rcu/update.c
index 9487b4898e51..6fb911558562 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/update.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/update.c
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ void __rcu_read_unlock(void)
barrier(); /* critical section before exit code. */
t->rcu_read_lock_nesting = INT_MIN;
barrier(); /* assign before ->rcu_read_unlock_special load */
- if (unlikely(ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_read_unlock_special)))
+ if (unlikely(ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_read_unlock_special.s)))
rcu_read_unlock_special(t);
barrier(); /* ->rcu_read_unlock_special load before assign */
t->rcu_read_lock_nesting = 0;
--
1.8.1.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-28 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-28 19:19 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/17] RCU-tasks implementation for 3.18 Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:19 ` [PATCH v7 tip/core/rcu 01/17] rcu: Add call_rcu_tasks() Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:19 ` [PATCH v7 tip/core/rcu 02/17] rcu: Provide cond_resched_rcu_qs() to force quiescent states in long loops Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:19 ` [PATCH v7 tip/core/rcu 03/17] rcu: Add synchronous grace-period waiting for RCU-tasks Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:19 ` [PATCH v7 tip/core/rcu 04/17] rcu: Make TASKS_RCU handle tasks that are almost done exiting Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:19 ` [PATCH v7 tip/core/rcu 05/17] rcu: Export RCU-tasks APIs to GPL modules Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:19 ` [PATCH v7 tip/core/rcu 06/17] rcutorture: Add torture tests for RCU-tasks Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:19 ` [PATCH v7 tip/core/rcu 07/17] rcutorture: Add RCU-tasks test cases Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:19 ` [PATCH v7 tip/core/rcu 08/17] rcu: Add stall-warning checks for RCU-tasks Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:20 ` [PATCH v7 tip/core/rcu 09/17] rcu: Improve RCU-tasks energy efficiency Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:20 ` [PATCH v7 tip/core/rcu 10/17] documentation: Add verbiage on RCU-tasks stall warning messages Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:20 ` [PATCH v7 tip/core/rcu 11/17] rcu: Defer rcu_tasks_kthread() creation till first call_rcu_tasks() Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:20 ` [PATCH v7 tip/core/rcu 12/17] rcu: Make TASKS_RCU handle nohz_full= CPUs Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:20 ` [PATCH v7 tip/core/rcu 13/17] rcu: Make rcu_tasks_kthread()'s GP-wait loop allow preemption Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:20 ` [PATCH v7 tip/core/rcu 14/17] rcu: Remove redundant preempt_disable() from rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch() Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:20 ` [PATCH v7 tip/core/rcu 15/17] rcu: Additional information on RCU-tasks stall-warning messages Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:20 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2014-08-28 19:20 ` [PATCH v7 tip/core/rcu 17/17] rcu: Per-CPU operation cleanups to rcu_*_qs() functions Paul E. McKenney
2014-09-18 22:22 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/17] RCU-tasks implementation for 3.18 Peter Zijlstra
2014-09-19 15:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1409253608-32538-16-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).