From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com,
bobby.prani@gmail.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 tip/core/rcu 17/17] rcu: Per-CPU operation cleanups to rcu_*_qs() functions
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 12:20:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1409253608-32538-17-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409253608-32538-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
The rcu_bh_qs(), rcu_preempt_qs(), and rcu_sched_qs() functions use
old-style per-CPU variable access and write to ->passed_quiesce even
if it is already set. This commit therefore updates to use the new-style
per-CPU variable access functions and avoids the spurious writes.
This commit also eliminates the "cpu" argument to these functions because
they are always invoked on the indicated CPU.
Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 4 ++--
include/linux/rcutiny.h | 2 +-
kernel/rcu/tiny.c | 10 +++++-----
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
kernel/softirq.c | 2 +-
6 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index 132e1e34cdca..2fab0e37afe0 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -261,8 +261,8 @@ static inline int rcu_preempt_depth(void)
/* Internal to kernel */
void rcu_init(void);
-void rcu_sched_qs(int cpu);
-void rcu_bh_qs(int cpu);
+void rcu_sched_qs(void);
+void rcu_bh_qs(void);
void rcu_check_callbacks(int cpu, int user);
struct notifier_block;
void rcu_idle_enter(void);
diff --git a/include/linux/rcutiny.h b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
index d40a6a451330..38cc5b1e252d 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutiny.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static inline void kfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head,
static inline void rcu_note_context_switch(int cpu)
{
- rcu_sched_qs(cpu);
+ rcu_sched_qs();
}
/*
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tiny.c b/kernel/rcu/tiny.c
index 717f00854fc0..61b8d2ccc2cb 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tiny.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tiny.c
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static void rcu_idle_enter_common(long long newval)
current->pid, current->comm,
idle->pid, idle->comm); /* must be idle task! */
}
- rcu_sched_qs(0); /* implies rcu_bh_qsctr_inc(0) */
+ rcu_sched_qs(); /* implies rcu_bh_inc() */
barrier();
rcu_dynticks_nesting = newval;
}
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ static int rcu_qsctr_help(struct rcu_ctrlblk *rcp)
* are at it, given that any rcu quiescent state is also an rcu_bh
* quiescent state. Use "+" instead of "||" to defeat short circuiting.
*/
-void rcu_sched_qs(int cpu)
+void rcu_sched_qs(void)
{
unsigned long flags;
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ void rcu_sched_qs(int cpu)
/*
* Record an rcu_bh quiescent state.
*/
-void rcu_bh_qs(int cpu)
+void rcu_bh_qs(void)
{
unsigned long flags;
@@ -251,9 +251,9 @@ void rcu_check_callbacks(int cpu, int user)
{
RCU_TRACE(check_cpu_stalls());
if (user || rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle())
- rcu_sched_qs(cpu);
+ rcu_sched_qs();
else if (!in_softirq())
- rcu_bh_qs(cpu);
+ rcu_bh_qs();
if (user)
rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch(current);
}
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index c880f5387b1f..4c340625ffd4 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -188,22 +188,24 @@ static int rcu_gp_in_progress(struct rcu_state *rsp)
* one since the start of the grace period, this just sets a flag.
* The caller must have disabled preemption.
*/
-void rcu_sched_qs(int cpu)
+void rcu_sched_qs(void)
{
- struct rcu_data *rdp = &per_cpu(rcu_sched_data, cpu);
-
- if (rdp->passed_quiesce == 0)
- trace_rcu_grace_period(TPS("rcu_sched"), rdp->gpnum, TPS("cpuqs"));
- rdp->passed_quiesce = 1;
+ if (!__this_cpu_read(rcu_sched_data.passed_quiesce)) {
+ trace_rcu_grace_period(TPS("rcu_sched"),
+ __this_cpu_read(rcu_sched_data.gpnum),
+ TPS("cpuqs"));
+ __this_cpu_write(rcu_sched_data.passed_quiesce, 1);
+ }
}
-void rcu_bh_qs(int cpu)
+void rcu_bh_qs(void)
{
- struct rcu_data *rdp = &per_cpu(rcu_bh_data, cpu);
-
- if (rdp->passed_quiesce == 0)
- trace_rcu_grace_period(TPS("rcu_bh"), rdp->gpnum, TPS("cpuqs"));
- rdp->passed_quiesce = 1;
+ if (!__this_cpu_read(rcu_bh_data.passed_quiesce)) {
+ trace_rcu_grace_period(TPS("rcu_bh"),
+ __this_cpu_read(rcu_bh_data.gpnum),
+ TPS("cpuqs"));
+ __this_cpu_write(rcu_bh_data.passed_quiesce, 1);
+ }
}
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, rcu_sched_qs_mask);
@@ -278,7 +280,7 @@ static void rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle(void)
void rcu_note_context_switch(int cpu)
{
trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("Start context switch"));
- rcu_sched_qs(cpu);
+ rcu_sched_qs();
rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(cpu);
if (unlikely(raw_cpu_read(rcu_sched_qs_mask)))
rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle();
@@ -2395,8 +2397,8 @@ void rcu_check_callbacks(int cpu, int user)
* at least not while the corresponding CPU is online.
*/
- rcu_sched_qs(cpu);
- rcu_bh_qs(cpu);
+ rcu_sched_qs();
+ rcu_bh_qs();
} else if (!in_softirq()) {
@@ -2407,7 +2409,7 @@ void rcu_check_callbacks(int cpu, int user)
* critical section, so note it.
*/
- rcu_bh_qs(cpu);
+ rcu_bh_qs();
}
rcu_preempt_check_callbacks(cpu);
if (rcu_pending(cpu))
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 471fc77bb146..73ce36b0b6a8 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -158,14 +158,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_batches_completed);
* As with the other rcu_*_qs() functions, callers to this function
* must disable preemption.
*/
-static void rcu_preempt_qs(int cpu)
-{
- struct rcu_data *rdp = &per_cpu(rcu_preempt_data, cpu);
-
- if (rdp->passed_quiesce == 0)
- trace_rcu_grace_period(TPS("rcu_preempt"), rdp->gpnum, TPS("cpuqs"));
- rdp->passed_quiesce = 1;
- current->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs = false;
+static void rcu_preempt_qs(void)
+{
+ if (!__this_cpu_read(rcu_preempt_data.passed_quiesce)) {
+ trace_rcu_grace_period(TPS("rcu_preempt"),
+ __this_cpu_read(rcu_preempt_data.gpnum),
+ TPS("cpuqs"));
+ __this_cpu_write(rcu_preempt_data.passed_quiesce, 1);
+ barrier(); /* Coordinate with rcu_preempt_check_callbacks(). */
+ current->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs = false;
+ }
}
/*
@@ -256,7 +258,7 @@ static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(int cpu)
* grace period, then the fact that the task has been enqueued
* means that we continue to block the current grace period.
*/
- rcu_preempt_qs(cpu);
+ rcu_preempt_qs();
}
/*
@@ -352,7 +354,7 @@ void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
*/
special = t->rcu_read_unlock_special;
if (special.b.need_qs) {
- rcu_preempt_qs(smp_processor_id());
+ rcu_preempt_qs();
if (!t->rcu_read_unlock_special.s) {
local_irq_restore(flags);
return;
@@ -651,11 +653,12 @@ static void rcu_preempt_check_callbacks(int cpu)
struct task_struct *t = current;
if (t->rcu_read_lock_nesting == 0) {
- rcu_preempt_qs(cpu);
+ rcu_preempt_qs();
return;
}
if (t->rcu_read_lock_nesting > 0 &&
- per_cpu(rcu_preempt_data, cpu).qs_pending)
+ per_cpu(rcu_preempt_data, cpu).qs_pending &&
+ !per_cpu(rcu_preempt_data, cpu).passed_quiesce)
t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs = true;
}
diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index 5918d227730f..348ec763b104 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ restart:
pending >>= softirq_bit;
}
- rcu_bh_qs(smp_processor_id());
+ rcu_bh_qs();
local_irq_disable();
pending = local_softirq_pending();
--
1.8.1.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-28 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-28 19:19 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/17] RCU-tasks implementation for 3.18 Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:19 ` [PATCH v7 tip/core/rcu 01/17] rcu: Add call_rcu_tasks() Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:19 ` [PATCH v7 tip/core/rcu 02/17] rcu: Provide cond_resched_rcu_qs() to force quiescent states in long loops Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:19 ` [PATCH v7 tip/core/rcu 03/17] rcu: Add synchronous grace-period waiting for RCU-tasks Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:19 ` [PATCH v7 tip/core/rcu 04/17] rcu: Make TASKS_RCU handle tasks that are almost done exiting Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:19 ` [PATCH v7 tip/core/rcu 05/17] rcu: Export RCU-tasks APIs to GPL modules Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:19 ` [PATCH v7 tip/core/rcu 06/17] rcutorture: Add torture tests for RCU-tasks Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:19 ` [PATCH v7 tip/core/rcu 07/17] rcutorture: Add RCU-tasks test cases Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:19 ` [PATCH v7 tip/core/rcu 08/17] rcu: Add stall-warning checks for RCU-tasks Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:20 ` [PATCH v7 tip/core/rcu 09/17] rcu: Improve RCU-tasks energy efficiency Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:20 ` [PATCH v7 tip/core/rcu 10/17] documentation: Add verbiage on RCU-tasks stall warning messages Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:20 ` [PATCH v7 tip/core/rcu 11/17] rcu: Defer rcu_tasks_kthread() creation till first call_rcu_tasks() Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:20 ` [PATCH v7 tip/core/rcu 12/17] rcu: Make TASKS_RCU handle nohz_full= CPUs Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:20 ` [PATCH v7 tip/core/rcu 13/17] rcu: Make rcu_tasks_kthread()'s GP-wait loop allow preemption Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:20 ` [PATCH v7 tip/core/rcu 14/17] rcu: Remove redundant preempt_disable() from rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch() Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:20 ` [PATCH v7 tip/core/rcu 15/17] rcu: Additional information on RCU-tasks stall-warning messages Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:20 ` [PATCH v7 tip/core/rcu 16/17] rcu: Remove local_irq_disable() in rcu_preempt_note_context_switch() Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:20 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2014-09-18 22:22 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/17] RCU-tasks implementation for 3.18 Peter Zijlstra
2014-09-19 15:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1409253608-32538-17-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).