From: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com>,
Chegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@hp.com>, Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] locking/rwsem: Avoid double checking before try acquiring write lock
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 12:01:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1410894118.2447.4.camel@j-VirtualBox> (raw)
Commit 9b0fc9c09f1b checks for if there are known active lockers in
order to avoid write trylocking using expensive cmpxchg() when it
likely wouldn't get the lock.
However, a subsequent patch was added such that we directly check for
sem->count == RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS right before trying that cmpxchg().
Thus, commit 9b0fc9c09f1b now just adds extra overhead. This patch
deletes it.
Also, add a comment on why we do an "extra check" of sem->count before
the cmpxchg().
Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
---
kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
index d6203fa..63d3ef2 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
@@ -247,18 +247,20 @@ struct rw_semaphore __sched *rwsem_down_read_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
return sem;
}
-static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(long count, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
- if (!(count & RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK)) {
- /* try acquiring the write lock */
- if (sem->count == RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS &&
- cmpxchg(&sem->count, RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS,
- RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS) == RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS) {
- if (!list_is_singular(&sem->wait_list))
- rwsem_atomic_update(RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS, sem);
- return true;
- }
+ /*
+ * Try acquiring the write lock. Check sem->count first
+ * in order to reduce unnecessary expensive cmpxchg() operations.
+ */
+ if (sem->count == RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS &&
+ cmpxchg(&sem->count, RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS,
+ RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS) == RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS) {
+ if (!list_is_singular(&sem->wait_list))
+ rwsem_atomic_update(RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS, sem);
+ return true;
}
+
return false;
}
@@ -446,7 +448,7 @@ struct rw_semaphore __sched *rwsem_down_write_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
/* wait until we successfully acquire the lock */
set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
while (true) {
- if (rwsem_try_write_lock(count, sem))
+ if (rwsem_try_write_lock(sem))
break;
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
--
1.7.1
next reply other threads:[~2014-09-16 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-16 19:01 Jason Low [this message]
2014-09-16 20:08 ` [PATCH v2] locking/rwsem: Avoid double checking before try acquiring write lock Peter Hurley
2014-09-16 20:51 ` Tim Chen
2014-09-16 22:01 ` Jason Low
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1410894118.2447.4.camel@j-VirtualBox \
--to=jason.low2@hp.com \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=chegu_vinod@hp.com \
--cc=dbueso@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox