public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
	Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@gmail.com>
Cc: Frans Klaver <fransklaver@gmail.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>,
	Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	acpi4asus-user@lists.sourceforge.net,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] eeepc-laptop: simplify parse_arg()
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 21:02:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1410980571.10248.6.camel@x220> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140916234543.GA22408@vmdeb7>

parse_arg() has three possible return values:
    -EINVAL if sscanf(), in short, fails;
    zero if "count" is zero; and
    "count" in all other cases

But "count" will never be zero. See, parse_arg() is called by the
various store functions. And the callchain of these functions starts
with sysfs_kf_write(). And that function checks for a zero "count". So
we can stop checking for a zero "count", drop the "count" argument
entirely, and transform parse_arg() into a function that returns zero on
success or a negative error. That, in turn, allows to make those store
functions just return "count" on success. The net effect is that the
code becomes a bit easier to understand.

A nice side effect is that this GCC warning is silenced too:
    drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c: In function ‘store_sys_acpi’:
    drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c:279:10: warning: ‘value’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
      int rv, value;

Which is, of course, the reason to have a look at parse_arg().

Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
---
Still build tested only, but now on top of v3.17-rc5. Has Frans tested
writing zero length values to these sysfs files?

v3: store_sys_acpi() again returns -EIO if set_acpi() fails.

v2: let store_sys_acpi() return whatever error set_acpi() returns
instead of remapping it to EIO. The new line about that in the commit
explanation is silly, but I couldn't come up with a better explanation.

 drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c
index bd533c22be57..3095d386c7f4 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c
@@ -263,13 +263,11 @@ static int acpi_setter_handle(struct eeepc_laptop *eeepc, int cm,
 /*
  * Sys helpers
  */
-static int parse_arg(const char *buf, unsigned long count, int *val)
+static int parse_arg(const char *buf, int *val)
 {
-	if (!count)
-		return 0;
 	if (sscanf(buf, "%i", val) != 1)
 		return -EINVAL;
-	return count;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static ssize_t store_sys_acpi(struct device *dev, int cm,
@@ -278,12 +276,13 @@ static ssize_t store_sys_acpi(struct device *dev, int cm,
 	struct eeepc_laptop *eeepc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 	int rv, value;
 
-	rv = parse_arg(buf, count, &value);
-	if (rv > 0)
-		value = set_acpi(eeepc, cm, value);
-	if (value < 0)
+	rv = parse_arg(buf, &value);
+	if (rv < 0)
+		return rv;
+	rv = set_acpi(eeepc, cm, value);
+	if (rv < 0)
 		return -EIO;
-	return rv;
+	return count;
 }
 
 static ssize_t show_sys_acpi(struct device *dev, int cm, char *buf)
@@ -377,13 +376,13 @@ static ssize_t store_cpufv(struct device *dev,
 		return -EPERM;
 	if (get_cpufv(eeepc, &c))
 		return -ENODEV;
-	rv = parse_arg(buf, count, &value);
+	rv = parse_arg(buf, &value);
 	if (rv < 0)
 		return rv;
-	if (!rv || value < 0 || value >= c.num)
+	if (value < 0 || value >= c.num)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	set_acpi(eeepc, CM_ASL_CPUFV, value);
-	return rv;
+	return count;
 }
 
 static ssize_t show_cpufv_disabled(struct device *dev,
@@ -402,7 +401,7 @@ static ssize_t store_cpufv_disabled(struct device *dev,
 	struct eeepc_laptop *eeepc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 	int rv, value;
 
-	rv = parse_arg(buf, count, &value);
+	rv = parse_arg(buf, &value);
 	if (rv < 0)
 		return rv;
 
@@ -412,7 +411,7 @@ static ssize_t store_cpufv_disabled(struct device *dev,
 			pr_warn("cpufv enabled (not officially supported "
 				"on this model)\n");
 		eeepc->cpufv_disabled = false;
-		return rv;
+		return count;
 	case 1:
 		return -EPERM;
 	default:
@@ -1042,10 +1041,11 @@ static ssize_t store_sys_hwmon(void (*set)(int), const char *buf, size_t count)
 {
 	int rv, value;
 
-	rv = parse_arg(buf, count, &value);
-	if (rv > 0)
-		set(value);
-	return rv;
+	rv = parse_arg(buf, &value);
+	if (rv < 0)
+		return rv;
+	set(value);
+	return count;
 }
 
 static ssize_t show_sys_hwmon(int (*get)(void), char *buf)
-- 
1.9.3



  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-17 19:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-03 22:53 [PATCH] eeepc-laptop: remove possible use of uninitialized value Frans Klaver
2014-09-04  0:49 ` Darren Hart
2014-09-04  1:14   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-09-04  6:46     ` Frans Klaver
2014-09-04 14:10       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-09-04 14:40         ` Frans Klaver
2014-09-04 19:37           ` Paul Bolle
2014-09-04  7:08 ` Paul Bolle
2014-09-04  7:57   ` Frans Klaver
2014-09-06  2:17   ` Darren Hart
2014-09-06 21:17     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-09-08 21:12       ` [PATCH] eeepc-laptop: remove disp attribute show function Frans Klaver
2014-09-08 21:16         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
     [not found]           ` <20140908212306.GA22145@gmail.com>
     [not found]             ` <20140908214438.GB22145@gmail.com>
2014-09-08 21:57               ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-09-08 23:32                 ` Darren Hart
2014-09-09  8:50       ` [PATCH] eeepc-laptop: remove possible use of uninitialized value Paul Bolle
2014-09-10  3:33         ` Darren Hart
2014-09-10 14:42           ` Frans Klaver
2014-09-10 16:49             ` Darren Hart
2014-09-10 20:05               ` [PATCH v2] eeepc-laptop: simplify parse_arg() Paul Bolle
2014-09-11 22:37                 ` Darren Hart
2014-09-16 23:45                   ` Darren Hart
2014-09-17 19:02                     ` Paul Bolle [this message]
2014-09-17 20:14                       ` [PATCH v3] " Darren Hart
2014-09-17 20:35                       ` Darren Hart
2014-09-17 20:36                         ` Frans Klaver
2014-09-17 21:39                         ` Frans Klaver
2014-09-09  0:06 ` [PATCH] eeepc-laptop: remove possible use of uninitialized value Darren Hart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1410980571.10248.6.camel@x220 \
    --to=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
    --cc=acpi4asus-user@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=corentin.chary@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=fransklaver@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.garrett@nebula.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox