* [PATCH 0/5] MN10300: Remove dead code depending on DEPRECATED
@ 2014-09-18 18:31 Paul Bolle
2015-01-14 19:11 ` Paul Bolle
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Paul Bolle @ 2014-09-18 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Howells, Koichi Yasutake
Cc: Richard Weinberger, Geert Uytterhoeven, linux-am33-list,
linux-kernel
0) Raised before in
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-am33-list/2011-November/msg00007.html .
1) Discussed, at length, in https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/9/164 .
2) Compile tested only (on top of next-20140918, using
arch/mn10300/configs/asb2303_defconfig).
3) Logically this should be one humongous patch. It is split into five
patches to ease review. Review, or actually any reaction whatsoever,
would be appreciated.
4) The last patch was basically done by checking the output of
git grep -i gdb.*stub arch/mn10300
and make educated guesses.
Paul Bolle (5):
MN10300: Remove Kconfig symbol GDBSTUB
MN10300: Remove Kconfig symbols depending on GDBSTUB
MN10300: Remove all checks for CONFIG_GDBSTUB
MN10300: Remove checks for GDBSTUB related Kconfig macros
MN10300: Remove remnants of gdbstub
arch/mn10300/Kconfig | 6 +-
arch/mn10300/Kconfig.debug | 120 +-
arch/mn10300/boot/compressed/misc.c | 9 -
arch/mn10300/include/asm/exceptions.h | 7 -
arch/mn10300/include/asm/gdb-stub.h | 182 ---
arch/mn10300/kernel/Makefile | 3 -
arch/mn10300/kernel/entry.S | 21 -
arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-io-serial-low.S | 91 --
arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-io-serial.c | 174 --
arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-io-ttysm-low.S | 93 --
arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-io-ttysm.c | 303 ----
arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-low.S | 115 --
arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-stub.c | 1923 -----------------------
arch/mn10300/kernel/head.S | 10 -
arch/mn10300/kernel/mn10300-serial.c | 28 +-
arch/mn10300/kernel/mn10300-serial.h | 15 -
arch/mn10300/kernel/mn10300-watchdog.c | 14 +-
arch/mn10300/kernel/process.c | 11 -
arch/mn10300/kernel/profile.c | 2 -
arch/mn10300/kernel/smp-low.S | 4 -
arch/mn10300/kernel/smp.c | 7 -
arch/mn10300/kernel/traps.c | 4 +-
arch/mn10300/mm/fault.c | 9 -
arch/mn10300/mm/misalignment.c | 1 -
arch/mn10300/mm/tlb-mn10300.S | 14 -
arch/mn10300/unit-asb2303/include/unit/serial.h | 85 -
arch/mn10300/unit-asb2303/unit-init.c | 4 +-
arch/mn10300/unit-asb2305/include/unit/serial.h | 78 -
arch/mn10300/unit-asb2305/unit-init.c | 6 +-
arch/mn10300/unit-asb2364/include/unit/serial.h | 66 -
arch/mn10300/unit-asb2364/unit-init.c | 4 +-
31 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3393 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 arch/mn10300/include/asm/gdb-stub.h
delete mode 100644 arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-io-serial-low.S
delete mode 100644 arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-io-serial.c
delete mode 100644 arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-io-ttysm-low.S
delete mode 100644 arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-io-ttysm.c
delete mode 100644 arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-low.S
delete mode 100644 arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-stub.c
--
1.9.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/5] MN10300: Remove dead code depending on DEPRECATED
2014-09-18 18:31 [PATCH 0/5] MN10300: Remove dead code depending on DEPRECATED Paul Bolle
@ 2015-01-14 19:11 ` Paul Bolle
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Paul Bolle @ 2015-01-14 19:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Howells, Koichi Yasutake
Cc: Richard Weinberger, Geert Uytterhoeven, linux-am33-list,
linux-kernel
David, Koichi,
On Thu, 2014-09-18 at 20:31 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> 0) Raised before in
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-am33-list/2011-November/msg00007.html .
>
> 1) Discussed, at length, in https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/9/164 .
>
> 2) Compile tested only (on top of next-20140918, using
> arch/mn10300/configs/asb2303_defconfig).
>
> 3) Logically this should be one humongous patch. It is split into five
> patches to ease review. Review, or actually any reaction whatsoever,
> would be appreciated.
>
> 4) The last patch was basically done by checking the output of
> git grep -i gdb.*stub arch/mn10300
>
> and make educated guesses.
>
> Paul Bolle (5):
> MN10300: Remove Kconfig symbol GDBSTUB
> MN10300: Remove Kconfig symbols depending on GDBSTUB
> MN10300: Remove all checks for CONFIG_GDBSTUB
> MN10300: Remove checks for GDBSTUB related Kconfig macros
> MN10300: Remove remnants of gdbstub
>
> arch/mn10300/Kconfig | 6 +-
> arch/mn10300/Kconfig.debug | 120 +-
> arch/mn10300/boot/compressed/misc.c | 9 -
> arch/mn10300/include/asm/exceptions.h | 7 -
> arch/mn10300/include/asm/gdb-stub.h | 182 ---
> arch/mn10300/kernel/Makefile | 3 -
> arch/mn10300/kernel/entry.S | 21 -
> arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-io-serial-low.S | 91 --
> arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-io-serial.c | 174 --
> arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-io-ttysm-low.S | 93 --
> arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-io-ttysm.c | 303 ----
> arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-low.S | 115 --
> arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-stub.c | 1923 -----------------------
> arch/mn10300/kernel/head.S | 10 -
> arch/mn10300/kernel/mn10300-serial.c | 28 +-
> arch/mn10300/kernel/mn10300-serial.h | 15 -
> arch/mn10300/kernel/mn10300-watchdog.c | 14 +-
> arch/mn10300/kernel/process.c | 11 -
> arch/mn10300/kernel/profile.c | 2 -
> arch/mn10300/kernel/smp-low.S | 4 -
> arch/mn10300/kernel/smp.c | 7 -
> arch/mn10300/kernel/traps.c | 4 +-
> arch/mn10300/mm/fault.c | 9 -
> arch/mn10300/mm/misalignment.c | 1 -
> arch/mn10300/mm/tlb-mn10300.S | 14 -
> arch/mn10300/unit-asb2303/include/unit/serial.h | 85 -
> arch/mn10300/unit-asb2303/unit-init.c | 4 +-
> arch/mn10300/unit-asb2305/include/unit/serial.h | 78 -
> arch/mn10300/unit-asb2305/unit-init.c | 6 +-
> arch/mn10300/unit-asb2364/include/unit/serial.h | 66 -
> arch/mn10300/unit-asb2364/unit-init.c | 4 +-
> 31 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3393 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 arch/mn10300/include/asm/gdb-stub.h
> delete mode 100644 arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-io-serial-low.S
> delete mode 100644 arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-io-serial.c
> delete mode 100644 arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-io-ttysm-low.S
> delete mode 100644 arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-io-ttysm.c
> delete mode 100644 arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-low.S
> delete mode 100644 arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-stub.c
This series still applies on top of next-20150114. Neither of you ever
bothered to send even the briefest of message regarding this issue.
I'm inclined to think mn10300 is actually orphaned. Would a patch that
makes MAINTAINERS reflect that thought trigger any response?
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-01-14 19:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-09-18 18:31 [PATCH 0/5] MN10300: Remove dead code depending on DEPRECATED Paul Bolle
2015-01-14 19:11 ` Paul Bolle
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox