From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
To: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sgrubb@redhat.com, aviro@redhat.com, pmoore@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] audit: cull redundancy in audit_rule_change
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 15:09:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1412968142.15099.3.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <92746f6d4ad17ce7af82d08f5b18443ca3b0c31b.1412285491.git.rgb@redhat.com>
On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 22:05 -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> Re-factor audit_rule_change() to reduce the amount of code redundancy and
> simplify the logic.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
> ---
> kernel/auditfilter.c | 20 +++++++-------------
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/auditfilter.c b/kernel/auditfilter.c
> index 4a11697..e3378a4 100644
> --- a/kernel/auditfilter.c
> +++ b/kernel/auditfilter.c
> @@ -1064,30 +1064,24 @@ int audit_rule_change(int type, __u32 portid, int seq, void *data,
> int err = 0;
> struct audit_entry *entry;
>
> + entry = audit_data_to_entry(data, datasz);
> + if (IS_ERR(entry))
> + return PTR_ERR(entry);
> +
> switch (type) {
> case AUDIT_ADD_RULE:
> - entry = audit_data_to_entry(data, datasz);
> - if (IS_ERR(entry))
> - return PTR_ERR(entry);
> -
> err = audit_add_rule(entry);
> audit_log_rule_change("add_rule", &entry->rule, !err);
> - if (err)
> - audit_free_rule(entry);
> break;
> case AUDIT_DEL_RULE:
> - entry = audit_data_to_entry(data, datasz);
> - if (IS_ERR(entry))
> - return PTR_ERR(entry);
> -
> err = audit_del_rule(entry);
> audit_log_rule_change("remove_rule", &entry->rule, !err);
> - audit_free_rule(entry);
> break;
> - default:
> - return -EINVAL;
I left the default case and made it:
err = -EINVAL;
WARN_ON(1);
Seemed like better defensive coding....
> }
>
> + if (err || type == AUDIT_DEL_RULE)
> + audit_free_rule(entry);
> +
> return err;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-10 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-02 21:38 [PATCH 0/7] audit fsnotify cleanups for watches and trees Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-03 2:05 ` [PATCH 1/7] audit: put rule existence check in canonical order Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-03 2:05 ` [PATCH 2/7] audit: cull redundancy in audit_rule_change Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-10 19:09 ` Eric Paris [this message]
2014-10-03 2:05 ` [PATCH 3/7] audit: eliminate string copy for new tree rules Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-10 19:13 ` Eric Paris
2014-10-03 2:05 ` [PATCH 4/7] audit: optimize add to parent skipping needless search and consuming parent ref Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-10 19:29 ` Eric Paris
2014-10-03 2:05 ` [PATCH 5/7] audit: remove redundant watch refcount Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-10 19:44 ` Eric Paris
2014-10-03 2:05 ` [PATCH 6/7] audit: remove extra audit_get_parent() Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-03 2:05 ` [PATCH 7/7] audit: rename audit_log_remove_rule to disambiguate for trees Richard Guy Briggs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1412968142.15099.3.camel@redhat.com \
--to=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=aviro@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmoore@redhat.com \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
--cc=sgrubb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).