From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752282AbaJKSXF (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Oct 2014 14:23:05 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0031.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.31]:55781 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751006AbaJKSXD (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Oct 2014 14:23:03 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:973:988:989:1260:1261:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1538:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2559:2562:2693:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3350:3622:3865:3867:3868:3870:3871:3872:3873:3874:4321:5007:7652:7875:7903:10004:10400:10848:11658:11914:12517:12519:12740:13069:13311:13357:21080,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: mark87_718c89554e002 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1822 Message-ID: <1413051779.22149.8.camel@joe-AO725> Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] ALSA: au88x0: pr_* replaced with dev_* From: Joe Perches To: Sudip Mukherjee Cc: Takashi Iwai , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Raymond Yau , Jaroslav Kysela Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 11:22:59 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <1412930199-24797-1-git-send-email-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> <1412930199-24797-2-git-send-email-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> <20141011090903.GC8231@sudip-PC> <1413024491.16385.10.camel@joe-AO725> <20141011113349.GA9962@sudip-PC> <1413041569.16385.20.camel@joe-AO725> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2014-10-11 at 23:40 +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > now in this case what will you suggest - shutdown and done both > terminated by \n or some thing like : "shutdown process started" and then > "shutdown done".... I think it doesn't matter one way or another as it's only useful when there's a hang in the init or shutdown. It is better though to have complete messages terminated with newlines so that it is not possible for other threads to confusingly interleave output.