From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751636AbaJYTPi (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Oct 2014 15:15:38 -0400 Received: from jambon.ath.cx ([212.129.4.85]:47640 "EHLO debian" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751023AbaJYTPh (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Oct 2014 15:15:37 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 347 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 15:15:36 EDT From: Junien Fridrick To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Junien Fridrick , Oleg Drokin , Andreas Dilger , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Peng Tao , Isaac Huang , LABBE Corentin , Doug Oucharek , HPDD-discuss@ml01.01.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org Subject: [PATCH] staging: lustre: fix sparse warning for static declarations Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 19:09:34 +0000 Message-Id: <1414264176-2546-1-git-send-email-linux.kernel@junien.fridrick.net> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.0.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This patch fixes the following sparse warnings : drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c:167:5: warning: symbol 'proc_lnet_routes' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c:293:5: warning: symbol 'proc_lnet_routers' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c:428:5: warning: symbol 'proc_lnet_peers' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c:660:5: warning: symbol 'proc_lnet_nis' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Junien Fridrick --- This patch is part of task 16 of the Eudyptula challenge Applies to next-20141023 drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c index 6e8f7e2..b82914f 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c @@ -164,8 +164,8 @@ static int proc_lnet_stats(struct ctl_table *table, int write, __proc_lnet_stats); } -int proc_lnet_routes(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void __user *buffer, - size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos) +static int proc_lnet_routes(struct ctl_table *table, int write, + void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos) { const int tmpsiz = 256; char *tmpstr; @@ -290,8 +290,8 @@ int proc_lnet_routes(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void __user *buffer, return rc; } -int proc_lnet_routers(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void __user *buffer, - size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos) +static int proc_lnet_routers(struct ctl_table *table, int write, + void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos) { int rc = 0; char *tmpstr; @@ -425,8 +425,8 @@ int proc_lnet_routers(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void __user *buffer, return rc; } -int proc_lnet_peers(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void __user *buffer, - size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos) +static int proc_lnet_peers(struct ctl_table *table, int write, + void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos) { const int tmpsiz = 256; struct lnet_peer_table *ptable; @@ -657,8 +657,8 @@ static int proc_lnet_buffers(struct ctl_table *table, int write, __proc_lnet_buffers); } -int proc_lnet_nis(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void __user *buffer, - size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos) +static int proc_lnet_nis(struct ctl_table *table, int write, + void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos) { int tmpsiz = 128 * LNET_CPT_NUMBER; int rc = 0; -- 2.0.1