From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com>
Cc: "backports@vger.kernel.org" <backports@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>,
Stefan Assmann <sassmann@kpanic.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 1/4] backports: replace CPTCFG prefix for CONFIG_BACKPORT
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 21:20:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1415046029.2726.6.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAB=NE6XWWcmRb-3r28obFmChzW1mnynG0LkVDr2-y+QVpq=y9Q@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20141103_205706_499759_FE8EC472)
On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 11:56 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> With my current code I end up with on a package (not integration):
>
> config BACKPORT_BUILD_AVERAGE
> bool
> depends on !AVERAGE
> default y if BACKPORT_USERSEL_BUILD_ALL
> default y if BACKPORT_AVERAGE
> #h-file linux/average.h
> #c-file lib/average.c
>
> config BACKPORT_AVERAGE
> bool
>
>
> I do see I on the package with this on the Makfile though:
>
>
> compat-$(CONFIG_BACKPORT_BACKPORT_BUILD_AVERAGE) += lib-average.o
>
> Would it not suffice to just ensure we don't have BACKPORT_BACKPORT_
> here and just BACKPORT_ once ?
The BACKPORT_BACKPORT_ is actually correct ... but it'll be really hard
to make sense of :-)
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-03 20:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-29 8:21 [RFC v2 0/4] backports: kernel integration support Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-10-29 8:21 ` [RFC v2 1/4] backports: replace CPTCFG prefix for CONFIG_BACKPORT Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-10-31 7:41 ` Johannes Berg
2014-10-31 19:34 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-10-31 20:22 ` Johannes Berg
2014-10-31 20:33 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-11-03 19:30 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-11-03 19:40 ` Johannes Berg
2014-11-03 19:56 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-11-03 20:20 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2014-11-03 20:21 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-11-03 20:24 ` Johannes Berg
2014-11-03 20:26 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-10-29 8:21 ` [RFC v2 2/4] backports: replace BACKPORT_PWD with BACKPORT_DIR Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-10-31 7:41 ` Johannes Berg
2014-10-31 19:35 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-10-29 8:21 ` [RFC v2 3/4] backports: use BACKPORT_DIR prefix on kconfig sources Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-10-31 7:46 ` Johannes Berg
2014-10-31 20:03 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-10-29 8:21 ` [RFC v2 4/4] backports: add kernl integration support to gentree.py Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-10-29 15:36 ` Stefan Assmann
2014-10-29 16:00 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-10-31 7:50 ` Johannes Berg
2014-10-31 20:10 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1415046029.2726.6.camel@sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=backports@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@suse.com \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=sassmann@kpanic.de \
--cc=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox