From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Myron Stowe <mstowe@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/vt-d: Only remove domain when device is removed
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 09:16:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1415290565.16601.92.camel@ul30vt.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141106125405.GI8354@suse.de>
On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 13:54 +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 09:12:17AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > I haven't tested it, but I'm concerned whether this has introduced a
> > domain leak. If we think about the case of unbinding a device from a
> > host driver and attaching it to a domain through the IOMMU API, I think
> > we used to count on this path to call domain_exit(), which made the
> > domain_context_mapped() in intel_iommu_attach_device() "unlikely". With
> > this change, isn't the test in intel_iommu_attach_device() now neither
> > likely nor unlikely and we're only removing the dev_info from the domain
> > and not destroying the domain itself? Thanks,
>
> As I see it, there is no leak. The DMA-API domains are kept in the
> device_domain_list and re-used when the device driver re-attaches. But
> your are right that the unlikely in intel_iommu_attach_device() isn't
> true anymore. We could probably remove it.
But the domains are unlinked from device_domain_list using
unlink_domain_info() which is called from both domain_remove_dev_info()
and domain_remove_one_dev_info() which are both part of that more
likely, unlikely branch in intel_iommu_attach_device(). So it seems
like any time we switch a device from the DMA-API to the IOMMU-API, we
lose the reference to the domain. Is that incorrect? I'll try to test.
Thanks,
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-06 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-30 11:02 [PATCH 0/2] iommu/vt-d: Keep RMRR mappings around on driver unbind Joerg Roedel
2014-09-30 11:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] driver core: Add BUS_NOTIFY_REMOVED_DEVICE event Joerg Roedel
2014-09-30 11:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] iommu/vt-d: Only remove domain when device is removed Joerg Roedel
2014-11-04 16:12 ` Alex Williamson
2014-11-06 12:54 ` Joerg Roedel
2014-11-06 16:16 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2014-11-06 16:43 ` Alex Williamson
2014-12-09 12:15 ` Joerg Roedel
2014-12-11 16:35 ` Jerry Hoemann
2014-12-12 15:56 ` Joerg Roedel
2014-10-01 22:35 ` [PATCH 0/2] iommu/vt-d: Keep RMRR mappings around on driver unbind Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-10-02 9:20 ` Joerg Roedel
2014-10-02 0:30 ` Jerry Hoemann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1415290565.16601.92.camel@ul30vt.home \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mstowe@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox