From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752285AbaKGUXT (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Nov 2014 15:23:19 -0500 Received: from mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com ([67.231.145.42]:27710 "EHLO mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751569AbaKGUXS (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Nov 2014 15:23:18 -0500 Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 15:21:29 -0500 From: Chris Mason Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] Move BTRFS RCU string to common library To: Omar Sandoval CC: Josef Bacik , "Paul E. McKenney" , Josh Triplett , Steven Rostedt , Mathieu Desnoyers , Lai Jiangshan , , , Omar Sandoval Message-ID: <1415391689.9491.0@mail.thefacebook.com> In-Reply-To: <1415391451-19108-1-git-send-email-osandov@osandov.com> References: <1415391451-19108-1-git-send-email-osandov@osandov.com> X-Mailer: geary/0.8.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed X-Originating-IP: [192.168.16.4] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.12.52,1.0.28,0.0.0000 definitions=2014-11-07_08:2014-11-07,2014-11-07,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=fb_default_notspam policy=fb_default score=0 kscore.is_bulkscore=0 kscore.compositescore=0 circleOfTrustscore=0 compositescore=0.925924926977281 urlsuspect_oldscore=0.925924926977281 suspectscore=0 recipient_domain_to_sender_totalscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 kscore.is_spamscore=0 recipient_to_sender_totalscore=0 recipient_domain_to_sender_domain_totalscore=64355 rbsscore=0.925924926977281 spamscore=0 recipient_to_sender_domain_totalscore=6 urlsuspectscore=0.9 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1402240000 definitions=main-1411070166 X-FB-Internal: deliver Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Omar Sandoval wrote: > The RCU-friendly string API used internally by BTRFS is generic > enough for > common use. This doesn't add any new functionality, but instead just > moves the > code and documents the existing API. > > Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett > Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney > Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval > --- > Chris, could you take a look at this again? It's just been rebased > and should > be good to go. Thanks! Thanks Omar, I'm pulling this into a branch for the next merge window. Looks good to me. -chris