From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752127AbaKJTcP (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:32:15 -0500 Received: from cpsmtpb-ews06.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.9]:58665 "EHLO cpsmtpb-ews06.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751018AbaKJTcL (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:32:11 -0500 Message-ID: <1415647928.21229.23.camel@x220> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 07/12] coresight-etm: add CoreSight ETM/PTM driver From: Paul Bolle To: Mathieu Poirier Cc: Valentin Rothberg , Greg KH , Russell King - ARM Linux , Pratik Patel , Vikas Varshney , Al Grant , Jonas Svennebring , James King , Kaixu Xia , Marcin Jabrzyk , "r.sengupta@samsung.com" , trollkarlen Marklund , Patch Tracking , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 20:32:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1415038066-22423-1-git-send-email-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> <1415038066-22423-8-git-send-email-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> <1415615671.4862.30.camel@x220> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4 (3.10.4-4.fc20) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Nov 2014 19:32:09.0432 (UTC) FILETIME=[04DA2D80:01CFFD1D] X-RcptDomain: vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 08:40 -0700, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > On 10 November 2014 03:34, Paul Bolle wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 11:07 -0700, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org wrote: > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_CORESIGHT_SOURCE_ETM_DEFAULT_ENABLE > > > > There's no Kconfig symbol CORESIGHT_SOURCE_ETM_DEFAULT_ENABLE. Neither > > is there a preprocessor definition of this macro. So why was this > > added? > > Correct - the feature (as we really want it) is currently being worked > on but not yet part of the code base. The default option probably > should have been removed but it doesn't do much else when mandating > one to add a boot option on the kernel cmd line. I'm afraid I'm not sure what you mean here. Anyhow, using a Kconfig symbol to set a default for something that can also be set through a kernel parameter might be considered overdoing it. But that's not for me to decide. Unless the patch that adds this Kconfig symbol takes a long time to land in linux-next, I won't be bothering you again. Thanks, Paul Bolle