From: Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com>
To: bp@alien8.de, tony.luck@intel.com
Cc: ak@linux.intel.com, aravind.gopalakrishnan@amd.com,
linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/2]RAS: add the support for handling UCNA/DEFERRED error
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 10:09:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1416276560-3363-1-git-send-email-slaoub@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi all,
At the suggestion of Boris, the first patch extends the mce_severity
mechanism for handling UCNA/DEFERRED error.
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/23/190
v2:
The first patch have also eliminated a big hack to make mce_severity()
work when called from non-exception context on the advice of Tony and
Boris.
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/27/1017
And on the basis of the first patch, the second patch adds the support
for identifying and handling UCNA/DEFERRED error in machine_check_poll.
V3:
According to Boris, the second patch have also split `memory_error'
from mem_deferred_error so that the memory_error() function can be used
in other code paths separately.
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/6/452
Boris also reported the warning about "MCI_STATUS_POISON" and "MCI_STATUS_POISON"
redefined.
V4:
Like MCIP/RIPV/EIPV bits, MCI_STATUS_EN is specific to "machine check exception".
As Tony suggested, the severity table entry for the "EN" check should have been
skipped when calling from the CMCI/Poll handler.
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/11/765
AMD APM Volume 2: 9.3.2 Error-Reporting Register Banks - MCi_STATUS
memory_error() is incomplete for AMD platform. Boris will try to have a
fix.
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/10/720
thx!
cyc
[PATCH v4 1/2] x86, mce, severity: extend the the mce_severity
[PATCH v4 2/2] x86, mce: support memory error recovery for both UCNA
next reply other threads:[~2014-11-18 2:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-18 2:09 Chen Yucong [this message]
2014-11-18 2:09 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] x86, mce, severity: extend the the mce_severity mechanism to handle UCNA/DEFERRED error Chen Yucong
2014-11-18 2:09 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] x86, mce: support memory error recovery for both UCNA and Deferred error in machine_check_poll Chen Yucong
2014-11-19 21:44 ` [PATCH v4 0/2]RAS: add the support for handling UCNA/DEFERRED error Tony Luck
2014-11-19 21:53 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1416276560-3363-1-git-send-email-slaoub@gmail.com \
--to=slaoub@gmail.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=aravind.gopalakrishnan@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox