From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755968AbaKSQSi (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:18:38 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34764 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750759AbaKSQSh (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:18:37 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 18:18:28 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au, davem@davemloft.net Subject: [PATCH 0/3] tun: flag cleanup Message-ID: <1416413891-29562-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Mutt-Fcc: =sent Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org this patchset cleans up flag handling in tun. It logically belongs to net tree, but I'm basing support for new virtio header on top of it. Similar situation will take place with vhost patches. Rusty, Dave, what's your take? Merge this patch through virtio tree? Merge both this patch and virtio 1.0 patches through vhost tree? I'm fine with any option. Please review/ack patches in any case. Michael S. Tsirkin (3): tun: move internal flag defines out of uapi tun: reuse IFF_ flags internally tun: drop most type defines include/uapi/linux/if_tun.h | 14 ----- drivers/net/tun.c | 125 ++++++++++++++++---------------------------- 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-) -- MST