From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, tj@kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] FRV: Fix the section attribute on UP DECLARE_PER_CPU()
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:40:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14172.1239795632@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0904141103550.18124@localhost.localdomain>
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> But yeah, I didn't look at all the details. It _looked_ pretty
> straightforward to just move the DEFINE/DECLARE stuff up, but there may well
> be something subtle I'm missing.
The problem is mainly one of #include recursion. There's way too much of it.
I wonder if we should replace the standard headerfile boilerplate:
#ifndef _THIS_HEADER_H
#define _THIS_HEADER_H
...
#endif /* _THIS_HEADER_H */
with something a bit nastier:
#ifndef _THIS_HEADER_H
#define _THIS_HEADER_H 1
...
#undef _THIS_HEADER_H
#define _THIS_HEADER_H 2
#elif _THIS_HEADER_H == 1
#error Recursive inclusion is not permitted
#endif /* _THIS_HEADER_H */
and make people break up their header files to avoid getting this error.
There are a number of problems with doing this, of course; the least of which
is that cpp has special code for handling the first case efficiently, IIRC.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-15 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-14 16:10 [PATCH] FRV: Fix the section attribute on UP DECLARE_PER_CPU() David Howells
2009-04-14 16:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-14 17:57 ` David Howells
2009-04-14 18:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-15 10:24 ` David Howells
2009-04-15 15:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-15 16:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-15 11:40 ` David Howells [this message]
2009-04-15 12:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-15 13:20 ` David Howells
2009-04-15 14:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-15 15:09 ` David Howells
2009-04-15 16:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-21 18:36 ` David Howells
2009-04-22 9:12 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14172.1239795632@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox