From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Christoph Jaeger <cj@linux.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>,
yann.morin.1998@free.fr, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] kconfig: remove undocumented type definition alias 'boolean'
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 22:15:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1418073300.2058.63.camel@x220> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1418070979.2058.52.camel@x220>
On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 21:36 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 20:41 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > Well, it seems the treewide "boolean" cleanup should be done first.
> > Removing support for "boolean" could than be a second, separate step.
> > Just to ease review.
>
> This appears to have no effect on the .config files I generated for the
> defconfig files in next-20141208. (After porting the patch and changing
> those last booleans to bool, that is.) So that's good.
>
> If you'd resend as two patches on top of linux-next, I might add an
> Acked-by: or a Tested-by:.
My last mail on this series. To make sure the tree stays buildable that
second patch to drop support for 'boolean' should only be applied a
release or two after the cleanup patch has been applied. Otherwise we're
bound to run into fun build errors in linux-next, and even mainline, for
quite a few commits, aren't we? One tree still using boolean is all it
takes...
Paul Bolle
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-08 21:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-08 1:49 [PATCH 0/3] remove undocumented type definition alias Christoph Jaeger
2014-12-08 1:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] kconfig: regenerate parser Christoph Jaeger
2014-12-08 20:28 ` Paul Bolle
2014-12-08 1:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] kconfig: remove undocumented type definition alias 'boolean' Christoph Jaeger
2014-12-08 18:51 ` Paul Bolle
2014-12-08 19:13 ` Paul Bolle
2014-12-08 19:16 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-12-08 19:41 ` Paul Bolle
2014-12-08 20:36 ` Paul Bolle
2014-12-08 21:15 ` Paul Bolle [this message]
2014-12-09 11:49 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-12-09 23:14 ` Christoph Jaeger
2014-12-08 1:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] kconfig: rename S_BOOLEAN to S_BOOL for consistency Christoph Jaeger
2014-12-08 20:43 ` Paul Bolle
2014-12-08 20:20 ` [PATCH 0/3] remove undocumented type definition alias Paul Bolle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1418073300.2058.63.camel@x220 \
--to=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cj@linux.com \
--cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox