From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Gavin Shan" <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Marek Kordík" <kordikmarek@gmail.com>,
zermond@gmail.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Clear bridge MEM_64 flag if one child does not support it
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 10:00:03 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1418079603.13358.12.camel@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1418079372.13358.9.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 09:56 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 13:52 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > 2. or scan the children resource other than ROM to clear bridge MEM_64
> > for mmio pref.
> >
> > The patch is using second way so will keep child mmio pref into bridge
> > mmio pref range.
>
> That means that having a single ROM BAR that is 32-bit and prefetchable
> will downgrade the entire window to 32-bit ? That's not going to work
> either.
>
> I have GPUs with 16G BARs for example... suddenly they don't fit
> anaymore because we downgraded the window to 32 bit because somewhere
> there's a 32-bit pref resource ?
>
> That will break more than it fixes...
I think an option would be to keep track of whether the PCI host bridge
can do 64-bit pref above 4G.
If it can't then we know 64-bit pref is always fair game for 32-bit
resources and we can thus downgrade all the bridges 64-pref to 32-perf.
If it can, then we probably do need to leave it there do real 64-bit
pref, and shoot anything that is 32-bit only down the non-pref windows.
We *could* try to be smart and scan first to check if anything under the
bridge actually has large/64-bit BARs but that's going to be a heuristic
at best and isn't going to do any good with hotplug.
I tend to think that treating anything 32-bit pref as non-pref is in
fact the best solution unless we know that the platform doesn't do
>32-bit pref anyway in which case we leave them alone.
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-08 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-08 21:52 [PATCH] PCI: Clear bridge MEM_64 flag if one child does not support it Yinghai Lu
2014-12-08 22:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-12-08 23:00 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2014-12-09 0:09 ` Yinghai Lu
2014-12-09 21:39 ` Yinghai Lu
2014-12-08 23:59 ` Yinghai Lu
2014-12-09 0:11 ` Gavin Shan
2014-12-09 2:26 ` Wei Yang
2014-12-09 7:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2014-12-09 7:56 ` Wei Yang
2014-12-09 18:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-12-10 9:42 ` Wei Yang
2014-12-09 19:49 ` Yinghai Lu
2014-12-09 18:07 ` Marek Kordík
2014-12-09 18:22 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-12-09 19:42 ` Yinghai Lu
2014-12-09 22:15 ` Marek Kordík
2014-12-09 23:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2014-12-09 1:08 ` Gavin Shan
2014-12-09 1:38 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1418079603.13358.12.camel@kernel.crashing.org \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kordikmarek@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=zermond@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox