public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Subject: [PATCH 06/12] x86: use {cpu|node}mask pr_cont and seq output functions
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:52:48 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1418226774-30215-7-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1418226774-30215-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

Convert the existing user of cpu{mask|list}_scnprintf() and
node{mask|list}_scnprintf() which use them just to printk or
seq_printf() the resulting buffer to use the following functions
instead respectively.

* For printk: cpu{mask|list}_pr_cont() and node{mask|list}_pr_cont().

* For seq_file: seq_cpumask[_list]() and seq_nodemask[_list]().

Because these conversions usually break up a single output function
call into multiple, the reduction is LOC isn't too big but it removes
unnecessary complexity and/or arbitrary limit on the length printed.

* uv_nmi_nr_cpus_pr() got overly smart and implemented "..."
  abbreviation if the output stretched over the predefined 1024 byte
  buffer.  Replaced with plain pr_cont.

This patch is dependent on the previous patch ("bitmap, cpumask,
nodemask: implement pr_cont variants of formatting functions") which
is planned to go through -mm.  It'd be the easiest to route this
together.  If this should go through the subsystem tree, please wait
till the forementioned patch is merged to mainline.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
---
 arch/x86/mm/numa.c            |  9 ++++-----
 arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_nmi.c | 27 +++++++++------------------
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
index 1a88370..614a302 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
@@ -794,7 +794,6 @@ int early_cpu_to_node(int cpu)
 void debug_cpumask_set_cpu(int cpu, int node, bool enable)
 {
 	struct cpumask *mask;
-	char buf[64];
 
 	if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE) {
 		/* early_cpu_to_node() already emits a warning and trace */
@@ -812,10 +811,10 @@ void debug_cpumask_set_cpu(int cpu, int node, bool enable)
 	else
 		cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mask);
 
-	cpulist_scnprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), mask);
-	printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s cpu %d node %d: mask now %s\n",
-		enable ? "numa_add_cpu" : "numa_remove_cpu",
-		cpu, node, buf);
+	printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s cpu %d node %d: mask now ",
+	       enable ? "numa_add_cpu" : "numa_remove_cpu", cpu, node);
+	cpulist_pr_cont(mask);
+	pr_cont("\n");
 	return;
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_nmi.c b/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_nmi.c
index c6b146e..61ee9cf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_nmi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_nmi.c
@@ -273,20 +273,6 @@ static inline void uv_clear_nmi(int cpu)
 	}
 }
 
-/* Print non-responding cpus */
-static void uv_nmi_nr_cpus_pr(char *fmt)
-{
-	static char cpu_list[1024];
-	int len = sizeof(cpu_list);
-	int c = cpumask_weight(uv_nmi_cpu_mask);
-	int n = cpulist_scnprintf(cpu_list, len, uv_nmi_cpu_mask);
-
-	if (n >= len-1)
-		strcpy(&cpu_list[len - 6], "...\n");
-
-	printk(fmt, c, cpu_list);
-}
-
 /* Ping non-responding cpus attemping to force them into the NMI handler */
 static void uv_nmi_nr_cpus_ping(void)
 {
@@ -371,16 +357,21 @@ static void uv_nmi_wait(int master)
 			break;
 
 		/* if not all made it in, send IPI NMI to them */
-		uv_nmi_nr_cpus_pr(KERN_ALERT
-			"UV: Sending NMI IPI to %d non-responding CPUs: %s\n");
+		pr_alert("UV: Sending NMI IPI to %d non-responding CPUs: ",
+			 cpumask_weight(uv_nmi_cpu_mask));
+		cpulist_pr_cont(uv_nmi_cpu_mask);
+		pr_cont("\n");
+
 		uv_nmi_nr_cpus_ping();
 
 		/* if all cpus are in, then done */
 		if (!uv_nmi_wait_cpus(0))
 			break;
 
-		uv_nmi_nr_cpus_pr(KERN_ALERT
-			"UV: %d CPUs not in NMI loop: %s\n");
+		pr_alert("UV: %d CPUs not in NMI loop: ",
+			 cpumask_weight(uv_nmi_cpu_mask));
+		cpulist_pr_cont(uv_nmi_cpu_mask);
+		pr_cont("\n");
 	} while (0);
 
 	pr_alert("UV: %d of %d CPUs in NMI\n",
-- 
2.1.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-12-10 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-10 15:52 [PATCHSET -mm] bitmap, cpumask, nodemask: implement pr_cont functions and use di" Tejun Heo
2014-12-10 15:52 ` [PATCH 01/12] bitmap: restructure bitmap_sn[list]printf() Tejun Heo
2014-12-10 15:52 ` [PATCH 02/12] bitmap, cpumask, nodemask: implement pr_cont variants of formatting functions Tejun Heo
2014-12-10 15:52 ` [PATCH 03/12] mips: use {cpu|node}mask pr_cont and seq output functions Tejun Heo
2014-12-10 15:52 ` [PATCH 04/12] powerpc: " Tejun Heo
2014-12-10 15:52 ` [PATCH 05/12] tile: " Tejun Heo
2014-12-15 16:20   ` Chris Metcalf
2014-12-10 15:52 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2014-12-10 15:52 ` [PATCH 07/12] xtensa: " Tejun Heo
2014-12-10 18:38   ` Max Filippov
2014-12-10 15:52 ` [PATCH 08/12] cpuset: " Tejun Heo
2014-12-10 15:52 ` [PATCH 09/12] rcu: " Tejun Heo
2014-12-10 16:29   ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-12-10 15:52 ` [PATCH 10/12] sched: " Tejun Heo
2014-12-15 10:39   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-12 13:31     ` Tejun Heo
2015-01-12 13:50       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-12 13:55         ` Tejun Heo
2015-01-12 14:00           ` Tejun Heo
2014-12-10 15:52 ` [PATCH 11/12] timer: " Tejun Heo
2014-12-10 15:52 ` [PATCH 12/12] percpu: " Tejun Heo
2014-12-10 21:49 ` [PATCHSET -mm] bitmap, cpumask, nodemask: implement pr_cont functions and use di" Andrew Morton
2014-12-10 22:12   ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1418226774-30215-7-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=travis@sgi.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox