From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Subject: [PATCH 06/12] x86: use {cpu|node}mask pr_cont and seq output functions
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:52:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1418226774-30215-7-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1418226774-30215-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Convert the existing user of cpu{mask|list}_scnprintf() and
node{mask|list}_scnprintf() which use them just to printk or
seq_printf() the resulting buffer to use the following functions
instead respectively.
* For printk: cpu{mask|list}_pr_cont() and node{mask|list}_pr_cont().
* For seq_file: seq_cpumask[_list]() and seq_nodemask[_list]().
Because these conversions usually break up a single output function
call into multiple, the reduction is LOC isn't too big but it removes
unnecessary complexity and/or arbitrary limit on the length printed.
* uv_nmi_nr_cpus_pr() got overly smart and implemented "..."
abbreviation if the output stretched over the predefined 1024 byte
buffer. Replaced with plain pr_cont.
This patch is dependent on the previous patch ("bitmap, cpumask,
nodemask: implement pr_cont variants of formatting functions") which
is planned to go through -mm. It'd be the easiest to route this
together. If this should go through the subsystem tree, please wait
till the forementioned patch is merged to mainline.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
---
arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 9 ++++-----
arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_nmi.c | 27 +++++++++------------------
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
index 1a88370..614a302 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
@@ -794,7 +794,6 @@ int early_cpu_to_node(int cpu)
void debug_cpumask_set_cpu(int cpu, int node, bool enable)
{
struct cpumask *mask;
- char buf[64];
if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE) {
/* early_cpu_to_node() already emits a warning and trace */
@@ -812,10 +811,10 @@ void debug_cpumask_set_cpu(int cpu, int node, bool enable)
else
cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mask);
- cpulist_scnprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), mask);
- printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s cpu %d node %d: mask now %s\n",
- enable ? "numa_add_cpu" : "numa_remove_cpu",
- cpu, node, buf);
+ printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s cpu %d node %d: mask now ",
+ enable ? "numa_add_cpu" : "numa_remove_cpu", cpu, node);
+ cpulist_pr_cont(mask);
+ pr_cont("\n");
return;
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_nmi.c b/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_nmi.c
index c6b146e..61ee9cf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_nmi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_nmi.c
@@ -273,20 +273,6 @@ static inline void uv_clear_nmi(int cpu)
}
}
-/* Print non-responding cpus */
-static void uv_nmi_nr_cpus_pr(char *fmt)
-{
- static char cpu_list[1024];
- int len = sizeof(cpu_list);
- int c = cpumask_weight(uv_nmi_cpu_mask);
- int n = cpulist_scnprintf(cpu_list, len, uv_nmi_cpu_mask);
-
- if (n >= len-1)
- strcpy(&cpu_list[len - 6], "...\n");
-
- printk(fmt, c, cpu_list);
-}
-
/* Ping non-responding cpus attemping to force them into the NMI handler */
static void uv_nmi_nr_cpus_ping(void)
{
@@ -371,16 +357,21 @@ static void uv_nmi_wait(int master)
break;
/* if not all made it in, send IPI NMI to them */
- uv_nmi_nr_cpus_pr(KERN_ALERT
- "UV: Sending NMI IPI to %d non-responding CPUs: %s\n");
+ pr_alert("UV: Sending NMI IPI to %d non-responding CPUs: ",
+ cpumask_weight(uv_nmi_cpu_mask));
+ cpulist_pr_cont(uv_nmi_cpu_mask);
+ pr_cont("\n");
+
uv_nmi_nr_cpus_ping();
/* if all cpus are in, then done */
if (!uv_nmi_wait_cpus(0))
break;
- uv_nmi_nr_cpus_pr(KERN_ALERT
- "UV: %d CPUs not in NMI loop: %s\n");
+ pr_alert("UV: %d CPUs not in NMI loop: ",
+ cpumask_weight(uv_nmi_cpu_mask));
+ cpulist_pr_cont(uv_nmi_cpu_mask);
+ pr_cont("\n");
} while (0);
pr_alert("UV: %d of %d CPUs in NMI\n",
--
2.1.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-10 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-10 15:52 [PATCHSET -mm] bitmap, cpumask, nodemask: implement pr_cont functions and use di" Tejun Heo
2014-12-10 15:52 ` [PATCH 01/12] bitmap: restructure bitmap_sn[list]printf() Tejun Heo
2014-12-10 15:52 ` [PATCH 02/12] bitmap, cpumask, nodemask: implement pr_cont variants of formatting functions Tejun Heo
2014-12-10 15:52 ` [PATCH 03/12] mips: use {cpu|node}mask pr_cont and seq output functions Tejun Heo
2014-12-10 15:52 ` [PATCH 04/12] powerpc: " Tejun Heo
2014-12-10 15:52 ` [PATCH 05/12] tile: " Tejun Heo
2014-12-15 16:20 ` Chris Metcalf
2014-12-10 15:52 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2014-12-10 15:52 ` [PATCH 07/12] xtensa: " Tejun Heo
2014-12-10 18:38 ` Max Filippov
2014-12-10 15:52 ` [PATCH 08/12] cpuset: " Tejun Heo
2014-12-10 15:52 ` [PATCH 09/12] rcu: " Tejun Heo
2014-12-10 16:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-12-10 15:52 ` [PATCH 10/12] sched: " Tejun Heo
2014-12-15 10:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-12 13:31 ` Tejun Heo
2015-01-12 13:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-12 13:55 ` Tejun Heo
2015-01-12 14:00 ` Tejun Heo
2014-12-10 15:52 ` [PATCH 11/12] timer: " Tejun Heo
2014-12-10 15:52 ` [PATCH 12/12] percpu: " Tejun Heo
2014-12-10 21:49 ` [PATCHSET -mm] bitmap, cpumask, nodemask: implement pr_cont functions and use di" Andrew Morton
2014-12-10 22:12 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1418226774-30215-7-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox