linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
	Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-api@vger.kernel.org" <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] perf: Use monotonic clock as a source for timestamps
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 13:39:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1418305153.4037.1.camel@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417100750.4371.1.camel@arm.com>

On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 15:05 +0000, Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 16:51 +0000, Pawel Moll wrote:
> > Until now, perf framework never defined the meaning of the timestamps
> > captured as PERF_SAMPLE_TIME sample type. The values were obtaining
> > from local (sched) clock, which is unavailable in userspace. This made
> > it impossible to correlate perf data with any other events. Other
> > tracing solutions have the source configurable (ftrace) or just share
> > a common time domain between kernel and userspace (LTTng).
> > 
> > Follow the trend by using monotonic clock, which is readily available
> > as POSIX CLOCK_MONOTONIC.
> > 
> > Also add a sysctl "perf_sample_time_clk_id" attribute which can be used
> > by the user to obtain the clk_id to be used with POSIX clock API (eg.
> > clock_gettime()) to obtain a time value comparable with perf samples.
> > 
> > Old behaviour can be restored by using "perf_use_local_clock" kernel
> > parameter.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
> 
> It's been 3 weeks without any negative feedback (no feedback at all, but
> I take the optimistic view :-)...
> 
> How about queuing at least this patch alone for the incoming merge
> window? Or at least getting it into -next, with the view at 3.20?

It's been another two weeks... How about getting it queued for v3.20
then?

Pawel


  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-11 13:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-06 16:51 [PATCH v4 0/3] perf: User/kernel time correlation and event generation Pawel Moll
2014-11-06 16:51 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] perf: Use monotonic clock as a source for timestamps Pawel Moll
2014-11-27 15:05   ` Pawel Moll
2014-12-11 13:39     ` Pawel Moll [this message]
2015-01-05 13:01       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-21 15:47         ` Pawel Moll
2015-01-05 13:00   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-21 15:52     ` Pawel Moll
2015-01-21 19:48       ` Pawel Moll
2015-01-21 20:07         ` Pawel Moll
2015-01-16 12:41   ` Adrian Hunter
2015-01-21 20:27   ` [PATCH v5] " Pawel Moll
2015-02-02 16:52     ` Pawel Moll
     [not found]       ` <CAN+dfcT_6zZZ4oeyngUE5N0Wtx2B9CvXsfU71m+cuyXpq2KBdw@mail.gmail.com>
2015-02-03  9:20         ` Pawel Moll
2015-02-11 16:12           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-12 10:04             ` Adrian Hunter
2015-02-12 10:28               ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-12 15:38                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-13  0:25                   ` John Stultz
2015-02-13  7:07                 ` Adrian Hunter
2014-11-06 16:51 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] perf: Userspace event Pawel Moll
2015-01-05 13:12   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-21 16:01     ` Pawel Moll
2014-11-06 16:51 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] perf: Sample additional clock value Pawel Moll
2015-01-05 13:45   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-05 19:17     ` John Stultz
2015-01-21 17:12     ` Pawel Moll
2015-01-21 17:44       ` John Stultz
2015-01-21 17:54         ` Pawel Moll
2015-01-21 18:05           ` John Stultz
2015-01-23 17:06     ` Pawel Moll
2015-01-23 18:05       ` David Ahern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1418305153.4037.1.camel@arm.com \
    --to=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=cov@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).