From: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-api@vger.kernel.org" <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] perf: Use monotonic clock as a source for timestamps
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 13:39:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1418305153.4037.1.camel@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417100750.4371.1.camel@arm.com>
On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 15:05 +0000, Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 16:51 +0000, Pawel Moll wrote:
> > Until now, perf framework never defined the meaning of the timestamps
> > captured as PERF_SAMPLE_TIME sample type. The values were obtaining
> > from local (sched) clock, which is unavailable in userspace. This made
> > it impossible to correlate perf data with any other events. Other
> > tracing solutions have the source configurable (ftrace) or just share
> > a common time domain between kernel and userspace (LTTng).
> >
> > Follow the trend by using monotonic clock, which is readily available
> > as POSIX CLOCK_MONOTONIC.
> >
> > Also add a sysctl "perf_sample_time_clk_id" attribute which can be used
> > by the user to obtain the clk_id to be used with POSIX clock API (eg.
> > clock_gettime()) to obtain a time value comparable with perf samples.
> >
> > Old behaviour can be restored by using "perf_use_local_clock" kernel
> > parameter.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
>
> It's been 3 weeks without any negative feedback (no feedback at all, but
> I take the optimistic view :-)...
>
> How about queuing at least this patch alone for the incoming merge
> window? Or at least getting it into -next, with the view at 3.20?
It's been another two weeks... How about getting it queued for v3.20
then?
Pawel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-11 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-06 16:51 [PATCH v4 0/3] perf: User/kernel time correlation and event generation Pawel Moll
2014-11-06 16:51 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] perf: Use monotonic clock as a source for timestamps Pawel Moll
2014-11-27 15:05 ` Pawel Moll
2014-12-11 13:39 ` Pawel Moll [this message]
2015-01-05 13:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-21 15:47 ` Pawel Moll
2015-01-05 13:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-21 15:52 ` Pawel Moll
2015-01-21 19:48 ` Pawel Moll
2015-01-21 20:07 ` Pawel Moll
2015-01-16 12:41 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-01-21 20:27 ` [PATCH v5] " Pawel Moll
2015-02-02 16:52 ` Pawel Moll
[not found] ` <CAN+dfcT_6zZZ4oeyngUE5N0Wtx2B9CvXsfU71m+cuyXpq2KBdw@mail.gmail.com>
2015-02-03 9:20 ` Pawel Moll
2015-02-11 16:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-12 10:04 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-02-12 10:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-12 15:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-13 0:25 ` John Stultz
2015-02-13 7:07 ` Adrian Hunter
2014-11-06 16:51 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] perf: Userspace event Pawel Moll
2015-01-05 13:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-21 16:01 ` Pawel Moll
2014-11-06 16:51 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] perf: Sample additional clock value Pawel Moll
2015-01-05 13:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-05 19:17 ` John Stultz
2015-01-21 17:12 ` Pawel Moll
2015-01-21 17:44 ` John Stultz
2015-01-21 17:54 ` Pawel Moll
2015-01-21 18:05 ` John Stultz
2015-01-23 17:06 ` Pawel Moll
2015-01-23 18:05 ` David Ahern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1418305153.4037.1.camel@arm.com \
--to=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=cov@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).