From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Roger <roger.chen@rock-chips.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
fengguang.wu@intel.com, kbuild-all@01.org,
peppe.cavallaro@st.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] GMAC: fix simple_return.cocci warnings
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 23:26:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1420529180.2652.31.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54AB8B23.3080303@rock-chips.com>
On Tue, 2015-01-06 at 15:13 +0800, Roger wrote:
> What should I do now?
I think it would be better to change
"int gmac_clk_enable" to "void gmac_clk_enable"
(it always returns 0)
This function should simply call gmac_clk_enable
and return 0;
> >>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
> >>> @@ -422,11 +422,7 @@ static int rk_gmac_init(struct platform_
> >>> if (ret)
> >>> return ret;
> >>>
> >>> - ret = gmac_clk_enable(bsp_priv, true);
> >>> - if (ret)
> >>> - return ret;
> >>> -
> >>> - return 0;
> >>> + return gmac_clk_enable(bsp_priv, true);
> >> I think this change is not particularly better.
> >>
> >> When the pattern is multiply repeated like:
> > ...
> >> I think it's better to not change the last
> >> test in the sequence just to minimize overall
> >> line count.
> > I think it's a wash and that both ways are about the same to me.
> >
> > I won't apply this, sorry.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-06 7:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <201501030822.7cG5bXrm%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
2015-01-03 0:25 ` [PATCH] GMAC: fix simple_return.cocci warnings kbuild test robot
2015-01-03 0:46 ` Joe Perches
2015-01-05 3:20 ` David Miller
2015-01-06 7:13 ` Roger
2015-01-06 7:26 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2015-01-06 7:52 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1420529180.2652.31.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peppe.cavallaro@st.com \
--cc=roger.chen@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox