* Re: [PATCH] rfkill: parameters documentation [not found] <CAAXZBWLOKL8Uu9No_tQga34nFurmeK2HP9qixO1jCXw1Y0t5HA@mail.gmail.com> @ 2015-01-05 9:24 ` Johannes Berg 2015-01-05 10:03 ` Andrew Clausen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Johannes Berg @ 2015-01-05 9:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Clausen, Andrew Morton Cc: John W. Linville, linux-wireless, linux-kernel On Fri, 2015-01-02 at 19:01 +0000, Andrew Clausen wrote: > Hi all, > > This patch documents two rfkill module parameters, namely > rfkill.default_state and rfkill.master_switch_mode. > > I constructed the patch from Ubuntu packaged source, but I'm happy to > adapt it to any git tree. > > Kind regards, > Andrew > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Clausen <andrew.p.clausen@gmail.com> Looks fine to me (though the commit message shouldn't contain the email "boilerplate" of "hi all" etc - should just be rfkill: document module parameters Document the two rfkill module parameters "default_state" and "master_switch_mode". Signed-off-by: ... However I'm not sure I should apply this through my tree? johannes > --- > > diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt > b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt > index 011855b..824ee3b 100644 > --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt > +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt > @@ -2999,6 +2999,20 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes can > also be entirely omitted. > > retain_initrd [RAM] Keep initrd memory after extraction > > + rfkill.default_state= > + 0 "airplane mode". All wifi, bluetooth, wimax, > + gps, fm, etc. communication is blocked by > + default. > + 1 Unblocked. > + > + rfkill.master_switch_mode= > + 0 The "airplane mode" button does nothing. > + 1 The "airplane mode" button toggles between > + everything blocked and the previous > + configuration. > + 2 The "airplane mode" button toggles between > + everything blocked and everything unblocked. > + > rhash_entries= [KNL,NET] > Set number of hash buckets for route cache > > diff --git a/Documentation/rfkill.txt b/Documentation/rfkill.txt > index 427e897..2ee6ef9 100644 > --- a/Documentation/rfkill.txt > +++ b/Documentation/rfkill.txt > @@ -25,6 +25,9 @@ whether they can be changed or not: > - soft block: writable radio block (need not be readable) that is set by > the system software. > > +The rfkill subsystem has two parameters, rfkill.default_state and > +rfkill.master_switch_mode, which are documented in kernel-parameters.txt. > + > > 2. Implementation details > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] rfkill: parameters documentation 2015-01-05 9:24 ` [PATCH] rfkill: parameters documentation Johannes Berg @ 2015-01-05 10:03 ` Andrew Clausen 2015-01-06 10:10 ` Johannes Berg 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Andrew Clausen @ 2015-01-05 10:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Johannes Berg Cc: Andrew Morton, John W. Linville, linux-wireless, linux-kernel Hi Johannes, On 5 January 2015 at 09:24, Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote: > Looks fine to me (though the commit message shouldn't contain the email > "boilerplate" of "hi all" etc - should just be Ah, sorry for the extra noise. > However I'm not sure I should apply this through my tree? I think you're right -- it makes sense to put it in your tree, and merge it down the track. (I don't think I've submitted a kernel patch since pre-git days, so sorry for the confusion.) Cheers, Andrew ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] rfkill: parameters documentation 2015-01-05 10:03 ` Andrew Clausen @ 2015-01-06 10:10 ` Johannes Berg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Johannes Berg @ 2015-01-06 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Clausen Cc: Andrew Morton, John W. Linville, linux-wireless, linux-kernel On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 10:03 +0000, Andrew Clausen wrote: > Hi Johannes, > > On 5 January 2015 at 09:24, Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote: > > Looks fine to me (though the commit message shouldn't contain the email > > "boilerplate" of "hi all" etc - should just be > > Ah, sorry for the extra noise. > > > However I'm not sure I should apply this through my tree? > > I think you're right -- it makes sense to put it in your tree, and > merge it down the track. (I don't think I've submitted a kernel patch > since pre-git days, so sorry for the confusion.) I'll take it. However, please resend with an adjust commit message, and please diff it against my mac80211-next tree (it doesn't apply as is) johannes ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-01-06 10:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <CAAXZBWLOKL8Uu9No_tQga34nFurmeK2HP9qixO1jCXw1Y0t5HA@mail.gmail.com>
2015-01-05 9:24 ` [PATCH] rfkill: parameters documentation Johannes Berg
2015-01-05 10:03 ` Andrew Clausen
2015-01-06 10:10 ` Johannes Berg
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox