From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753271AbbAGNkX (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jan 2015 08:40:23 -0500 Received: from smarthost01a.mail.zen.net.uk ([212.23.1.1]:48573 "EHLO smarthost01a.mail.zen.net.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753114AbbAGNkW (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jan 2015 08:40:22 -0500 Message-ID: <1420638014.4044.52.camel@linaro.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 00/11] ARM: kprobes: OPTPROBES and other improvements. From: "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" To: Wang Nan , Masami Hiramatsu Cc: linux@arm.linux.org.uk, lizefan@huawei.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 13:40:14 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1420457284-76923-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com> References: <1420457284-76923-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-smarthost01a-IP: [82.69.122.217] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I think that the patches up to 09/11 inclusive have been though more that enough review and revisions to think about getting them merged, there doesn't seem much point in continuously resending them whilst new features are built on top of them. Masami Hiramatsu, are you happy for your patch to generic+X86 kprobes code [1] to go through the ARM maintainers tree, assuming Russell is also happy with that. Or should that go via a different route? [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-January/313218.html Wang Nan, assuming everyone is happy, can you put together a branch in a git repository for those patches, or I'm more than happy to do that if you like. Then I can give the series a final test and we can send a pull request to Russell King. Thanks all -- Tixy