linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
	dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com,
	bobby.prani@gmail.com,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/14] rcu: Abstract rcu_cleanup_dead_rnp() from rcu_cleanup_dead_cpu()
Date: Wed,  7 Jan 2015 09:32:22 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1420651953-2651-3-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1420651953-2651-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

This commit abstracts rcu_cleanup_dead_rnp() from rcu_cleanup_dead_cpu()
in preparation for the rework of RCU priority boosting.  This new function
will be invoked from rcu_read_unlock_special() in the reworked scheme,
which is why rcu_cleanup_dead_rnp() assumes that the leaf rcu_node
structure's ->qsmaskinit field has already been updated.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c        | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 kernel/rcu/tree.h        |  1 +
 kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 17 ++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 4c106fcc0d54..75c6b3301abb 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2227,6 +2227,46 @@ static void rcu_cleanup_dying_cpu(struct rcu_state *rsp)
 }
 
 /*
+ * All CPUs for the specified rcu_node structure have gone offline,
+ * and all tasks that were preempted within an RCU read-side critical
+ * section while running on one of those CPUs have since exited their RCU
+ * read-side critical section.  Some other CPU is reporting this fact with
+ * the specified rcu_node structure's ->lock held and interrupts disabled.
+ * This function therefore goes up the tree of rcu_node structures,
+ * clearing the corresponding bits in the ->qsmaskinit fields.  Note that
+ * the leaf rcu_node structure's ->qsmaskinit field has already been
+ * updated
+ *
+ * This function does check that the specified rcu_node structure has
+ * all CPUs offline and no blocked tasks, so it is OK to invoke it
+ * prematurely.  That said, invoking it after the fact will cost you
+ * a needless lock acquisition.  So once it has done its work, don't
+ * invoke it again.
+ */
+static void rcu_cleanup_dead_rnp(struct rcu_node *rnp_leaf)
+{
+	long mask;
+	struct rcu_node *rnp = rnp_leaf;
+
+	if (rnp->qsmaskinit || rcu_preempt_has_tasks(rnp))
+		return;
+	for (;;) {
+		mask = rnp->grpmask;
+		rnp = rnp->parent;
+		if (!rnp)
+			break;
+		raw_spin_lock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */
+		smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(); /* GP memory ordering. */
+		rnp->qsmaskinit &= ~mask;
+		if (rnp->qsmaskinit) {
+			raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled. */
+			return;
+		}
+		raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled. */
+	}
+}
+
+/*
  * The CPU has been completely removed, and some other CPU is reporting
  * this fact from process context.  Do the remainder of the cleanup,
  * including orphaning the outgoing CPU's RCU callbacks, and also
@@ -2236,7 +2276,6 @@ static void rcu_cleanup_dying_cpu(struct rcu_state *rsp)
 static void rcu_cleanup_dead_cpu(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
-	unsigned long mask;
 	int need_report = 0;
 	struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu);
 	struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode;  /* Outgoing CPU's rdp & rnp. */
@@ -2252,24 +2291,14 @@ static void rcu_cleanup_dead_cpu(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp)
 	rcu_send_cbs_to_orphanage(cpu, rsp, rnp, rdp);
 	rcu_adopt_orphan_cbs(rsp, flags);
 
-	/* Remove the outgoing CPU from the masks in the rcu_node hierarchy. */
-	mask = rdp->grpmask;	/* rnp->grplo is constant. */
-	do {
-		raw_spin_lock(&rnp->lock);	/* irqs already disabled. */
-		smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
-		rnp->qsmaskinit &= ~mask;
-		if (rnp->qsmaskinit != 0) {
-			if (rnp != rdp->mynode)
-				raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled. */
-			break;
-		}
-		if (rnp == rdp->mynode)
-			need_report = rcu_preempt_offline_tasks(rsp, rnp, rdp);
-		else
-			raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled. */
-		mask = rnp->grpmask;
-		rnp = rnp->parent;
-	} while (rnp != NULL);
+	/* Remove outgoing CPU from mask in the leaf rcu_node structure. */
+	raw_spin_lock(&rnp->lock);	/* irqs already disabled. */
+	smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();	/* Enforce GP memory-order guarantee. */
+	rnp->qsmaskinit &= ~rdp->grpmask;
+	if (rnp->qsmaskinit == 0) {
+		need_report = rcu_preempt_offline_tasks(rsp, rnp, rdp);
+		rcu_cleanup_dead_rnp(rnp);
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * We still hold the leaf rcu_node structure lock here, and
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index 8e7b1843896e..9315477b47d9 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -552,6 +552,7 @@ static int rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(struct rcu_node *rnp);
 #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
 static void rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp(struct rcu_node *rnp,
 				      unsigned long flags);
+static bool rcu_preempt_has_tasks(struct rcu_node *rnp);
 #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
 static void rcu_print_detail_task_stall(struct rcu_state *rsp);
 static int rcu_print_task_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp);
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 3d22f0b2dea9..d044b9cbbd97 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -307,6 +307,15 @@ static struct list_head *rcu_next_node_entry(struct task_struct *t,
 }
 
 /*
+ * Return true if the specified rcu_node structure has tasks that were
+ * preempted within an RCU read-side critical section.
+ */
+static bool rcu_preempt_has_tasks(struct rcu_node *rnp)
+{
+	return !list_empty(&rnp->blkd_tasks);
+}
+
+/*
  * Handle special cases during rcu_read_unlock(), such as needing to
  * notify RCU core processing or task having blocked during the RCU
  * read-side critical section.
@@ -967,6 +976,14 @@ static void rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp(struct rcu_node *rnp, unsigned long flags)
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Because there is no preemptible RCU, there can be no readers blocked.
+ */
+static bool rcu_preempt_has_tasks(struct rcu_node *rnp)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+
 #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
 
 /*
-- 
1.8.1.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-01-07 17:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-07 17:32 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/14] Preemptible-RCU updates for 3.20 Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:32 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/14] rcu: Protect rcu_boost() lockless accesses with ACCESS_ONCE() Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:32   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/14] rcu: Rename "empty" to "empty_norm" in preparation for boost rework Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:32   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2015-01-07 17:32   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/14] rcu: Make rcu_read_unlock_special() propagate ->qsmaskinit bit clearing Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:32   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/14] rcu: Don't migrate blocked tasks even if all corresponding CPUs offline Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:32   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/14] rcu: Shorten irq-disable region in rcu_cleanup_dead_cpu() Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:32   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/14] rcu: Make use of rcu_preempt_has_tasks() Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:32   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/14] rcu: Don't spawn rcub kthreads on root rcu_node structure Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:32   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/14] rcu: Don't initiate RCU priority boosting on root rcu_node Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:32   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/14] rcu: Don't bother affinitying rcub kthreads away from offline CPUs Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:32   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/14] rcu: Note quiescent state when CPU goes offline Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:32   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/14] rcu: Revert "Allow post-unlock reference for rt_mutex" to avoid priority-inversion Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:32   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/14] rcu: Don't scan root rcu_node structure for stalled tasks Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:32   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu: Remove redundant callback-list initialization Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-08  9:41   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/14] rcu: Protect rcu_boost() lockless accesses with ACCESS_ONCE() Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-08 15:22     ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-09  6:41       ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-01-09 13:49         ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-09 13:56           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-09 14:07             ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-09 16:53               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-01-09 21:58             ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-01-10  0:27               ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-01-12  8:59               ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-12 22:12                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-13  8:18                   ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-01-13  9:29                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-13 17:47                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-13 19:12                     ` Davidlohr Bueso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1420651953-2651-3-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).