From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com,
bobby.prani@gmail.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/14] rcu: Don't initiate RCU priority boosting on root rcu_node
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 09:32:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1420651953-2651-9-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1420651953-2651-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Because there is no longer any preempted tasks on the root rcu_node, and
because there is no longer ever an rcub kthread for the root rcu_node,
this commit drops the code in force_qs_rnp() that attempts to awaken
the non-existent root rcub kthread. This is strictly a performance
enhancement, removing a root rcu_node ->lock acquisition and release
along with some tests in rcu_initiate_boost(), ending with the test that
notes that there is no rcub kthread.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 990b406faf4e..5a0a4c969d38 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2513,12 +2513,6 @@ static void force_qs_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp,
}
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
}
- rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
- if (rnp->qsmask == 0) {
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
- smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
- rcu_initiate_boost(rnp, flags); /* releases rnp->lock. */
- }
}
/*
--
1.8.1.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-07 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-07 17:32 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/14] Preemptible-RCU updates for 3.20 Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:32 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/14] rcu: Protect rcu_boost() lockless accesses with ACCESS_ONCE() Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:32 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/14] rcu: Rename "empty" to "empty_norm" in preparation for boost rework Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:32 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/14] rcu: Abstract rcu_cleanup_dead_rnp() from rcu_cleanup_dead_cpu() Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:32 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/14] rcu: Make rcu_read_unlock_special() propagate ->qsmaskinit bit clearing Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:32 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/14] rcu: Don't migrate blocked tasks even if all corresponding CPUs offline Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:32 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/14] rcu: Shorten irq-disable region in rcu_cleanup_dead_cpu() Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:32 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/14] rcu: Make use of rcu_preempt_has_tasks() Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:32 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/14] rcu: Don't spawn rcub kthreads on root rcu_node structure Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:32 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2015-01-07 17:32 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/14] rcu: Don't bother affinitying rcub kthreads away from offline CPUs Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:32 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/14] rcu: Note quiescent state when CPU goes offline Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:32 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/14] rcu: Revert "Allow post-unlock reference for rt_mutex" to avoid priority-inversion Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:32 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/14] rcu: Don't scan root rcu_node structure for stalled tasks Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:32 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu: Remove redundant callback-list initialization Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-08 9:41 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/14] rcu: Protect rcu_boost() lockless accesses with ACCESS_ONCE() Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-08 15:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-09 6:41 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-01-09 13:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-09 13:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-09 14:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-09 16:53 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-01-09 21:58 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-01-10 0:27 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-01-12 8:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-12 22:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-13 8:18 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-01-13 9:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-13 17:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-13 19:12 ` Davidlohr Bueso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1420651953-2651-9-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).