From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com,
bobby.prani@gmail.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/3] rcu: Combine DEFINE_SRCU() and DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU()
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 09:39:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1420652348-3867-2-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1420652348-3867-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
The DEFINE_SRCU() and DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU() definitions are quite
similar, so this commit combines them, saving a bit of code and removing
redundancy.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/srcu.h | 10 ++++------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/srcu.h b/include/linux/srcu.h
index ef923dd96249..9cfd9623fb03 100644
--- a/include/linux/srcu.h
+++ b/include/linux/srcu.h
@@ -102,13 +102,11 @@ void process_srcu(struct work_struct *work);
* define and init a srcu struct at build time.
* dont't call init_srcu_struct() nor cleanup_srcu_struct() on it.
*/
-#define DEFINE_SRCU(name) \
+#define __DEFINE_SRCU(name, is_static) \
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct srcu_struct_array, name##_srcu_array);\
- struct srcu_struct name = __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT(name);
-
-#define DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU(name) \
- static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct srcu_struct_array, name##_srcu_array);\
- static struct srcu_struct name = __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT(name);
+ is_static struct srcu_struct name = __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT(name)
+#define DEFINE_SRCU(name) __DEFINE_SRCU(name, /* not static */)
+#define DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU(name) __DEFINE_SRCU(name, static)
/**
* call_srcu() - Queue a callback for invocation after an SRCU grace period
--
1.8.1.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-07 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-07 17:38 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/3] SRCU changes for 3.20 Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:39 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] rcu: Expand SRCU ->completed to 64 bits Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:39 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2015-01-07 17:39 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/3] rcu: Make SRCU optional by using CONFIG_SRCU Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1420652348-3867-2-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).