From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
linux-am33-list@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] MN10300: Remove dead code depending on DEPRECATED
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 20:11:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1421262663.4464.9.camel@x220> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411065089.2017.72.camel@x220>
David, Koichi,
On Thu, 2014-09-18 at 20:31 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> 0) Raised before in
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-am33-list/2011-November/msg00007.html .
>
> 1) Discussed, at length, in https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/9/164 .
>
> 2) Compile tested only (on top of next-20140918, using
> arch/mn10300/configs/asb2303_defconfig).
>
> 3) Logically this should be one humongous patch. It is split into five
> patches to ease review. Review, or actually any reaction whatsoever,
> would be appreciated.
>
> 4) The last patch was basically done by checking the output of
> git grep -i gdb.*stub arch/mn10300
>
> and make educated guesses.
>
> Paul Bolle (5):
> MN10300: Remove Kconfig symbol GDBSTUB
> MN10300: Remove Kconfig symbols depending on GDBSTUB
> MN10300: Remove all checks for CONFIG_GDBSTUB
> MN10300: Remove checks for GDBSTUB related Kconfig macros
> MN10300: Remove remnants of gdbstub
>
> arch/mn10300/Kconfig | 6 +-
> arch/mn10300/Kconfig.debug | 120 +-
> arch/mn10300/boot/compressed/misc.c | 9 -
> arch/mn10300/include/asm/exceptions.h | 7 -
> arch/mn10300/include/asm/gdb-stub.h | 182 ---
> arch/mn10300/kernel/Makefile | 3 -
> arch/mn10300/kernel/entry.S | 21 -
> arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-io-serial-low.S | 91 --
> arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-io-serial.c | 174 --
> arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-io-ttysm-low.S | 93 --
> arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-io-ttysm.c | 303 ----
> arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-low.S | 115 --
> arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-stub.c | 1923 -----------------------
> arch/mn10300/kernel/head.S | 10 -
> arch/mn10300/kernel/mn10300-serial.c | 28 +-
> arch/mn10300/kernel/mn10300-serial.h | 15 -
> arch/mn10300/kernel/mn10300-watchdog.c | 14 +-
> arch/mn10300/kernel/process.c | 11 -
> arch/mn10300/kernel/profile.c | 2 -
> arch/mn10300/kernel/smp-low.S | 4 -
> arch/mn10300/kernel/smp.c | 7 -
> arch/mn10300/kernel/traps.c | 4 +-
> arch/mn10300/mm/fault.c | 9 -
> arch/mn10300/mm/misalignment.c | 1 -
> arch/mn10300/mm/tlb-mn10300.S | 14 -
> arch/mn10300/unit-asb2303/include/unit/serial.h | 85 -
> arch/mn10300/unit-asb2303/unit-init.c | 4 +-
> arch/mn10300/unit-asb2305/include/unit/serial.h | 78 -
> arch/mn10300/unit-asb2305/unit-init.c | 6 +-
> arch/mn10300/unit-asb2364/include/unit/serial.h | 66 -
> arch/mn10300/unit-asb2364/unit-init.c | 4 +-
> 31 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3393 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 arch/mn10300/include/asm/gdb-stub.h
> delete mode 100644 arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-io-serial-low.S
> delete mode 100644 arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-io-serial.c
> delete mode 100644 arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-io-ttysm-low.S
> delete mode 100644 arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-io-ttysm.c
> delete mode 100644 arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-low.S
> delete mode 100644 arch/mn10300/kernel/gdb-stub.c
This series still applies on top of next-20150114. Neither of you ever
bothered to send even the briefest of message regarding this issue.
I'm inclined to think mn10300 is actually orphaned. Would a patch that
makes MAINTAINERS reflect that thought trigger any response?
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-14 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-18 18:31 [PATCH 0/5] MN10300: Remove dead code depending on DEPRECATED Paul Bolle
2015-01-14 19:11 ` Paul Bolle [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1421262663.4464.9.camel@x220 \
--to=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-am33-list@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox