From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752492AbbARKii (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jan 2015 05:38:38 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com ([209.85.212.180]:46582 "EHLO mail-wi0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752438AbbARKia (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jan 2015 05:38:30 -0500 From: Lorenzo Stoakes To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: anarey@gmail.com, mcgrof@do-not-panic.com, tapaswenipathak@gmail.com, joe@perches.com, rmfrfs@gmail.com, yejiayily@gmail.com, gdonald@gmail.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lorenzo Stoakes Subject: [PATCH RESEND 2 4/4] staging: rtl8192u: Refactor heavy nesting Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 10:37:00 +0000 Message-Id: <1421577420-10115-4-git-send-email-lstoakes@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.2.2 In-Reply-To: <1421577420-10115-1-git-send-email-lstoakes@gmail.com> References: <1421577420-10115-1-git-send-email-lstoakes@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This patch fixes warnings raised by checkpatch.pl relating to heavily indented lines in r8192U_dm.c by refactoring code to achieve the same outcome indented by one less tab. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes --- drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c | 27 ++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c index aeb8aa2..f024782 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c @@ -2637,28 +2637,25 @@ static void dm_rxpath_sel_byrssi(struct net_device *dev) cck_rx_ver2_sec_index = cck_rx_ver2_max_index; tmp_cck_max_pwdb = cur_cck_pwdb; cck_rx_ver2_max_index = i; - } else if (cur_cck_pwdb == tmp_cck_max_pwdb) { /* let sec and min point to the different index */ + } else if (cur_cck_pwdb == tmp_cck_max_pwdb) { + /* let sec and min point to the different index */ tmp_cck_sec_pwdb = cur_cck_pwdb; cck_rx_ver2_sec_index = i; } else if ((cur_cck_pwdb < tmp_cck_max_pwdb) && (cur_cck_pwdb > tmp_cck_sec_pwdb)) { tmp_cck_sec_pwdb = cur_cck_pwdb; cck_rx_ver2_sec_index = i; - } else if (cur_cck_pwdb == tmp_cck_sec_pwdb) { - if (tmp_cck_sec_pwdb == tmp_cck_min_pwdb) { /* let sec and min point to the different index */ - tmp_cck_sec_pwdb = cur_cck_pwdb; - cck_rx_ver2_sec_index = i; - } else { - /* This case we don't need to set any index */ - } + } else if (cur_cck_pwdb == tmp_cck_sec_pwdb && tmp_cck_sec_pwdb == tmp_cck_min_pwdb) { + /* let sec and min point to the different index */ + tmp_cck_sec_pwdb = cur_cck_pwdb; + cck_rx_ver2_sec_index = i; + /* otherwise we don't need to set any index */ } else if ((cur_cck_pwdb < tmp_cck_sec_pwdb) && (cur_cck_pwdb > tmp_cck_min_pwdb)) { /* This case we don't need to set any index */ - } else if (cur_cck_pwdb == tmp_cck_min_pwdb) { - if (tmp_cck_sec_pwdb == tmp_cck_min_pwdb) { /* let sec and min point to the different index */ - tmp_cck_min_pwdb = cur_cck_pwdb; - cck_rx_ver2_min_index = i; - } else { - /* This case we don't need to set any index */ - } + } else if (cur_cck_pwdb == tmp_cck_min_pwdb && tmp_cck_sec_pwdb == tmp_cck_min_pwdb) { + /* let sec and min point to the different index */ + tmp_cck_min_pwdb = cur_cck_pwdb; + cck_rx_ver2_min_index = i; + /* otherwise we don't need to set any index */ } else if (cur_cck_pwdb < tmp_cck_min_pwdb) { tmp_cck_min_pwdb = cur_cck_pwdb; cck_rx_ver2_min_index = i; -- 2.2.2