From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755314AbbAWLII (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 23 Jan 2015 06:08:08 -0500
Received: from cpsmtpb-ews05.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.8]:58849 "EHLO
	cpsmtpb-ews05.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755294AbbAWLIC (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 23 Jan 2015 06:08:02 -0500
Message-ID: <1422011280.30730.34.camel@x220>
Subject: Re: gpio: ARCH_MB86S7X?
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>,
        Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com>,
        Andy Green <andy.green@linaro.org>,
        Vincent Yang <Vincent.Yang@tw.fujitsu.com>,
        Tetsuya Nuriya <nuriya.tetsuya@jp.fujitsu.com>,
        Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
        "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:08:00 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdbikHEU57nKDxKTm9fm8S4dTAnCcH_3Fh18JEfDrqL=vw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1422008501.30730.22.camel@x220>
	 <CAJe_ZhcVZNzbEiVBsvHDqsYOdCXA9fmZuHrQMQ-jFDWuoobovQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CACRpkdbikHEU57nKDxKTm9fm8S4dTAnCcH_3Fh18JEfDrqL=vw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4 (3.10.4-4.fc20) 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Jan 2015 11:07:59.0964 (UTC) FILETIME=[D95529C0:01D036FC]
X-RcptDomain: vger.kernel.org
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 2015-01-23 at 11:55 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On 23 January 2015 at 15:51, Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> wrote:
> 
> >> So, for what it's worth, that dependency appears to be not needed to
> >> build this driver.
> >>
> > Linus.W, what do you suggest? Just drop the dependency?
> 
> Nah, not right now atleast. As there is a plan to get the platform
> in it will just cause trouble.
> 
> What we can do is to say that it will be available also for
> CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST, so it gets built on the servers
> etc.
> 
> depends on ARCH_MB86S7X || COMPILE_TEST
> 
> But then you better test it a lot because then it will be
> compiled on X86_64 and such.

Whatever you do, I won't be bothering you again about this. Unless
ARCH_MB86S7X takes a long time to land, that is.


Paul Bolle