From: green@linuxhacker.ru
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Liang Zhen <liang.zhen@intel.com>,
Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 01/20] staging/lustre/ptlrpc: avoid list scan in ptlrpcd_check
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2015 21:52:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1422845539-26742-2-git-send-email-green@linuxhacker.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1422845539-26742-1-git-send-email-green@linuxhacker.ru>
From: Liang Zhen <liang.zhen@intel.com>
ptlrpcd_check() always scan all requests on ptlrpc_request_set
and try to finish completed requests, this is low efficiency.
Even worse, l_wait_event() always checks condition for twice
before sleeping and one more time after waking up, which means
it will call ptlrpcd_check() for three times in each loop.
This patch will move completed requests at the head of list
in ptlrpc_check_set(), with this change ptlrpcd_check doesn't
need to scan all requests anymore.
Signed-off-by: Liang Zhen <liang.zhen@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/11513
Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-5548
Reviewed-by: Bobi Jam <bobijam@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Johann Lombardi <johann.lombardi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/client.c | 12 +++++++++++-
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/ptlrpcd.c | 23 +++++++++--------------
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/client.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/client.c
index dc9e406..8c1ec83 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/client.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/client.c
@@ -1497,11 +1497,13 @@ static inline int ptlrpc_set_producer(struct ptlrpc_request_set *set)
int ptlrpc_check_set(const struct lu_env *env, struct ptlrpc_request_set *set)
{
struct list_head *tmp, *next;
+ struct list_head comp_reqs;
int force_timer_recalc = 0;
if (atomic_read(&set->set_remaining) == 0)
return 1;
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&comp_reqs);
list_for_each_safe(tmp, next, &set->set_requests) {
struct ptlrpc_request *req =
list_entry(tmp, struct ptlrpc_request,
@@ -1576,8 +1578,10 @@ int ptlrpc_check_set(const struct lu_env *env, struct ptlrpc_request_set *set)
ptlrpc_rqphase_move(req, req->rq_next_phase);
}
- if (req->rq_phase == RQ_PHASE_COMPLETE)
+ if (req->rq_phase == RQ_PHASE_COMPLETE) {
+ list_move_tail(&req->rq_set_chain, &comp_reqs);
continue;
+ }
if (req->rq_phase == RQ_PHASE_INTERPRET)
goto interpret;
@@ -1860,9 +1864,15 @@ interpret:
if (req->rq_status != 0)
set->set_rc = req->rq_status;
ptlrpc_req_finished(req);
+ } else {
+ list_move_tail(&req->rq_set_chain, &comp_reqs);
}
}
+ /* move completed request at the head of list so it's easier for
+ * caller to find them */
+ list_splice(&comp_reqs, &set->set_requests);
+
/* If we hit an error, we want to recover promptly. */
return atomic_read(&set->set_remaining) == 0 || force_timer_recalc;
}
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/ptlrpcd.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/ptlrpcd.c
index cbcc541..4621b71 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/ptlrpcd.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/ptlrpcd.c
@@ -306,21 +306,16 @@ static int ptlrpcd_check(struct lu_env *env, struct ptlrpcd_ctl *pc)
if (atomic_read(&set->set_remaining))
rc |= ptlrpc_check_set(env, set);
- if (!list_empty(&set->set_requests)) {
- /*
- * XXX: our set never completes, so we prune the completed
- * reqs after each iteration. boy could this be smarter.
- */
- list_for_each_safe(pos, tmp, &set->set_requests) {
- req = list_entry(pos, struct ptlrpc_request,
- rq_set_chain);
- if (req->rq_phase != RQ_PHASE_COMPLETE)
- continue;
+ /* NB: ptlrpc_check_set has already moved completed request at the
+ * head of seq::set_requests */
+ list_for_each_safe(pos, tmp, &set->set_requests) {
+ req = list_entry(pos, struct ptlrpc_request, rq_set_chain);
+ if (req->rq_phase != RQ_PHASE_COMPLETE)
+ break;
- list_del_init(&req->rq_set_chain);
- req->rq_set = NULL;
- ptlrpc_req_finished(req);
- }
+ list_del_init(&req->rq_set_chain);
+ req->rq_set = NULL;
+ ptlrpc_req_finished(req);
}
if (rc == 0) {
--
2.1.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-02 2:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-02 2:51 [PATCH 00/20] Lustre fixes green
2015-02-02 2:52 ` green [this message]
2015-02-02 2:52 ` [PATCH 02/20] staging/lustre/osc: split different type of IO green
2015-02-02 2:52 ` [PATCH 03/20] staging/lustre/ldlm: high load because of negative timeout green
2015-02-02 2:52 ` [PATCH 04/20] staging/lustre/libcfs: fix illegal page access of tracefiled() green
2015-02-02 2:52 ` [PATCH 05/20] staging/lustre/obdclass: fix a race in recovery green
2015-02-02 2:52 ` [PATCH 06/20] staging/lustre: fix comparison between signed and unsigned green
2015-02-02 13:02 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-02-02 15:44 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-02-02 20:25 ` Oleg Drokin
2015-02-02 20:51 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-02-02 23:16 ` Oleg Drokin
2015-02-02 2:52 ` [PATCH 07/20] staging/lustre/lnet: peer aliveness status and NI status green
2015-02-02 2:52 ` [PATCH 08/20] staging/lustre/llite: to configure max_cached_mb correctly green
2015-02-02 2:52 ` [PATCH 09/20] staging/lustre/llite: remove llite proc root on init failure green
2015-02-02 2:52 ` [PATCH 10/20] staging/lustre/obdclass: Proper swabbing of llog_rec_tail green
2015-02-02 2:52 ` [PATCH 11/20] staging/lustre/lnet: portal spreading rotor should be unsigned green
2015-02-02 2:52 ` [PATCH 12/20] staging/lustre/obd: change type of cl_conn_count to size_t green
2015-02-07 9:30 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-02-02 2:52 ` [PATCH 13/20] staging/lustre/ptlrpc: hold rq_lock when modify rq_flags green
2015-02-02 2:52 ` [PATCH 14/20] staging/lustre/llite: Solve a race to access lli_has_smd in read case green
2015-02-02 2:52 ` [PATCH 15/20] staging/lustre/fld: refer to MDT0 for fld lookup in some cases green
2015-02-02 2:52 ` [PATCH 16/20] staging/lustre/libcfs: protect kkuc_groups from write access green
2015-02-02 2:52 ` [PATCH 17/20] staging/lustre/llite: Add exception entry check after radix_tree green
2015-02-02 2:52 ` [PATCH 18/20] staging/lustre/llite: don't add to page cache upon failure green
2015-02-02 2:52 ` [PATCH 19/20] staging/lustre/clio: Do not allow group locks with gid 0 green
2015-02-02 2:52 ` [PATCH 20/20] staging/lustre/mdc: Initialize req in mdc_enqueue for !it case green
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1422845539-26742-2-git-send-email-green@linuxhacker.ru \
--to=green@linuxhacker.ru \
--cc=andreas.dilger@intel.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=liang.zhen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox