From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932890AbbBBR4l (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Feb 2015 12:56:41 -0500 Received: from mx2.parallels.com ([199.115.105.18]:47408 "EHLO mx2.parallels.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932424AbbBBR4h (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Feb 2015 12:56:37 -0500 From: James Bottomley To: "hch@lst.de" CC: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "dovl@codeaurora.org" , "ygardi@codeaurora.org" , "kishon@ti.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "arnd@arndb.de" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: qcom-ufs: export symbols needed by main drivers Thread-Topic: [PATCH] phy: qcom-ufs: export symbols needed by main drivers Thread-Index: AQHQOxYAusPBkOjK3UuAyRuGiZKAoJzeCnmAgAAPjACAABkQAA== Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 17:55:48 +0000 Message-ID: <1422899790.2103.11.camel@parallels.com> References: <1840882.huchmEIh5K@wuerfel> <1422891069.2103.1.camel@parallels.com> <20150202162648.GA20465@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20150202162648.GA20465@lst.de> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [50.46.149.214] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <951A533B38FB4445B2A90C0C65CDE3A1@sw.swsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by nfs id t12HukBx004867 On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 17:26 +0100, hch@lst.de wrote: > On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 03:30:27PM +0000, James Bottomley wrote: > > Cc added for linux-scsi, since this is the origin of the problem. How > > important is bisectability in this? It won't affect any non-embedded > > user, since most don't build with UFS, so I can go either way on folding > > or just applying as an extra patch. > > The CRYPTO_DEV_QCOM_ICE symbol was never defined in the scsi trees, and > would have needed something else from linux-next to even compile. So I > don't think the revert is a problem at all, and I'll add it to the > scsi-for-3.20 branch ASAP. Actually, on the revert of scsi: ufs-qcom-ice: add Inline Crypto Engine (ICE) support for UFS Which isn't what this problem is (the exports still need adding), since it's only in the misc tree, let's just drop the patches rather than doing an add and revert. James {.n++%ݶw{.n+{G{ayʇڙ,jfhz_(階ݢj"mG?&~iOzv^m ?I