From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: watchdog: SOC_MT7621?
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 12:04:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1423047893.23022.13.camel@x220> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54D1F248.4090406@openwrt.org>
On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 11:19 +0100, John Crispin wrote:
> On 04/02/2015 11:13, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > Is SOC_MT7621 still being worked on?
>
> yes we dropped the series as it collided with the gic rework that
> chromiun.org was working on. i hope to push it during the next merge
> window. the 1004k support has just been flaky till now as there was
> never any real silicon to test it on. the chromium people really did a
> good job at making the gic code nicer.
Thanks for explaining this. Unless SOC_MT7621 takes a long time to land
in linux-next I won't be bothering you again about this. (I think I'll
use "by the end of the v3.20 series" as a definition of a long time.)
> quite an impressive Cc list you have there
Yes, that's the way it works with problems that span two (or more)
subsystems (in this case watchdog and MIPS). Actually, much longer CC
lists are used regularly on lkml.
Thanks!
Paul Bolle
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-04 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-04 10:13 watchdog: SOC_MT7621? Paul Bolle
2015-02-04 10:19 ` John Crispin
2015-02-04 11:04 ` Paul Bolle [this message]
2015-02-04 11:10 ` John Crispin
2015-02-04 12:22 ` Paul Bolle
2015-02-04 13:59 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-02-04 14:14 ` John Crispin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1423047893.23022.13.camel@x220 \
--to=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=blogic@openwrt.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=valentinrothberg@gmail.com \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox