From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Sreekanth Reddy <Sreekanth.Reddy@avagotech.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: Concerns about "mpt2sas: Added Reply Descriptor Post Queue (RDPQ) Array support"
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 16:06:09 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1424408769.27448.28.camel@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424408500.27448.25.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 16:01 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Hi Sreekanth !
>
> While looking at some (unrelated) issue where mtp2sas seems to be using
> 32-bit DMA instead of 64-bit DMA on some POWER platforms, I noticed this
> patch which was merged as 5fb1bf8aaa832e1e9ca3198de7bbecb8eff7db9c.
>
> Can you confirm my understanding that you are:
>
> - Setting the DMA mask to 32-bit
>
> - Mapping pages for DMA
>
> - Changing the DMA mask to 64-bit
>
> ?
>
> If yes, then I don't think this is a legal thing to do and definitely
> not something supported by all architectures. It might work by accident,
> but there is no telling that any translation/DMA mapping provided before
> a call to set_dma_mask() is still valid after that call.
>
> The architecture might have to completely reconfigure the iommu, for
> example on some PowerPC platforms, we switch from a remapped mapping to
> a direct linear map of all memory, all translations established before
> the switch might be lost (it depends on the specific implementation).
>
> How does it work on x86 with DMAR ?
Note that even on powerpc platforms where it would work because we
maintain both 32-bit and 64-bit bypass windows in the device address
space simultaneously, you will leak iommu entries unless you also switch
back to 32-bit when freeing the 32-bit mappings... (and you would
probably crash if you tried to free a 64-bit mapping while in 32-bit
mode).
The iommu APIs weren't designed with that "switching mask" facility in
mind...
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-20 5:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-20 5:01 Concerns about "mpt2sas: Added Reply Descriptor Post Queue (RDPQ) Array support" Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-02-20 5:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2015-02-20 5:22 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-02-20 5:45 ` James Bottomley
2015-02-20 7:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-04-02 5:39 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-04-02 5:59 ` James Bottomley
2015-02-20 7:16 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1424408769.27448.28.camel@kernel.crashing.org \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=Sreekanth.Reddy@avagotech.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox