From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752151AbbCDVKB (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2015 16:10:01 -0500 Received: from cpsmtpb-ews01.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.4]:56473 "EHLO cpsmtpb-ews01.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750917AbbCDVJ7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2015 16:09:59 -0500 Message-ID: <1425503395.2090.31.camel@tiscali.nl> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/18] ARM: msm multiplatform support From: Paul Bolle To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, David Brown , Daniel Walker , Bryan Huntsman , Stephen Boyd , Tim Bird , Bjorn Andersson , Linus Walleij , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ulf Hansson Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 22:09:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: <3942232.3OrEzc0z0v@wuerfel> References: <1425497592-1831064-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <1425501092.2090.21.camel@tiscali.nl> <3942232.3OrEzc0z0v@wuerfel> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11 (3.12.11-1.fc21) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Mar 2015 21:09:56.0755 (UTC) FILETIME=[91241E30:01D056BF] X-RcptDomain: vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [Added Michal and kbuild.] Arnd Bergmann schreef op wo 04-03-2015 om 21:35 [+0100]: > On Wednesday 04 March 2015 21:31:32 Paul Bolle wrote: > > Arnd Bergmann schreef op wo 04-03-2015 om 20:32 [+0100]: > > > arch/arm/mach-msm/board-sapphire.c | 17 +- > > > > Please be aware that board-sapphire.c isn't actually wired into the > > build system _at all_. It never has been (see > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/14/634 ). There's another thread were the > > submitter of this file basically refuses to remove this file, if memory > > serves me right. > > > > I try not to use colorful language on the net. Perhaps I wouldn't have > > to bother you now if I would have used such language last year. > > I noticed this, but since it was not standing in the way of what I tried > to do, I did not do anything about it here. > > > You touch board-sapphire.c in 12/18 and 17/18. That was a waste of your > > time, however small. Should I submit a separate patch to remove it or do > > you prefer to fold such a patch into this series? > > The patch would be appreciated, but I'd keep it separate from this series. > I saw a lot of things in need of cleanup in the files I touched here, > but refused the temptation, in order to get something done and not > start something controversial. I'll resubmit my trivial patch once this series hits linux-next. Feel free to prod me if I forget. Paul Bolle