public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Cc: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
Subject: Re: softlockups in multi_cpu_stop
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 19:10:05 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1425697805.19505.92.camel@stgolabs.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACVXFVMsO1fvbQmsPMTvLmyNW=_cJzYPCtzACjYAuq4GcLn7kA@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, 2015-03-07 at 10:55 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 18:26 -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> >> That's not what this is about. New lock _owners_ need to worry about
> >                                                       ^^^ make that "need not"
> 
> Sorry, could you explain a bit why new owner can't be scheduled
> out(on_cpu becomes zero)? If that is possible, it still can cause
> soft lockup like current problem.

Oh its not that it can't be scheduled out. The point is we don't care
what happens with the lock owner itself (new or not). We care about, and
the point of this discussion, how _other_ threads handle themselves when
trying to take that lock (a lock having an owner implies the lock is not
free, of course). So if a lock owner gets scheduled out... so what?
That's already taken into account by spinners.


  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-07  3:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-02  7:45 sched: softlockups in multi_cpu_stop Sasha Levin
     [not found] ` <CAMiJ5CVWvUhGK=MWYB_CTNs901p=jsT4i5gkWTaHih7qdQdkFQ@mail.gmail.com>
2015-03-04  5:44   ` Rafael David Tinoco
2015-03-06 11:27 ` Sasha Levin
2015-03-06 12:32   ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-06 14:34     ` Rafael David Tinoco
2015-03-06 14:45       ` Sasha Levin
2015-03-06 15:46         ` Sasha Levin
2015-03-06 17:19     ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-03-06 18:02       ` Sasha Levin
2015-03-06 21:59         ` Sasha Levin
2015-03-06 18:57       ` Jason Low
2015-03-06 19:05         ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-06 19:20           ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-03-06 19:32             ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-06 19:45               ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-03-06 19:55               ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-03-06 20:00                 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-03-06 21:42                 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-06 19:29           ` Jason Low
2015-03-06 21:12             ` Jason Low
2015-03-06 21:24               ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-07  1:53                 ` Jason Low
2015-03-06 22:15               ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-03-07  1:55                 ` Ming Lei
2015-03-07  2:07                   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-03-07  2:10                     ` Ming Lei
2015-03-07  2:26                       ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-03-07  2:29                         ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-03-07  2:55                           ` Ming Lei
2015-03-07  3:10                             ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2015-03-07  3:19                               ` Ming Lei
2015-03-07  3:41                                 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-03-07  2:56                       ` Jason Low
2015-03-07  3:08                         ` Ming Lei
2015-03-07  3:10                           ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-03-07  3:17                           ` Jason Low
2015-03-07  3:39                             ` Ming Lei
2015-03-07  3:53                               ` Jason Low
2015-03-07  1:58                 ` Jason Low
2015-03-07  4:31               ` Jason Low
2015-03-07  4:44                 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-03-07  6:45                   ` Jason Low
2015-03-07  5:54                 ` Ming Lei
2015-03-07  6:57                   ` Jason Low

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1425697805.19505.92.camel@stgolabs.net \
    --to=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
    --cc=jason.low2@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox