From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Krogerus, Heikki" <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] clk: fractional-divider: switch to rational best approximation
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 12:33:03 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1427794383.14897.453.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75Vd=t=szZ0eXiGYVVVTv4hWAu35tV53wEq6LB0vx2dCsJw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 10:42 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 3:32 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> > On 03/30/15 11:57, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> This patch converts the code to use rational best approximation algorithm which
> >> is more precise.
>
> >> --- a/drivers/clk/Kconfig
> >> +++ b/drivers/clk/Kconfig
> >> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ config COMMON_CLK
> >> select HAVE_CLK_PREPARE
> >> select CLKDEV_LOOKUP
> >> select SRCU
> >> + select RATIONAL
> >> ---help---
> >> The common clock framework is a single definition of struct
> >> clk, useful across many platforms, as well as an
> >> @@ -63,7 +64,6 @@ config COMMON_CLK_SI5351
> >> tristate "Clock driver for SiLabs 5351A/B/C"
> >> depends on I2C
> >> select REGMAP_I2C
> >> - select RATIONAL
> >> ---help---
> >> This driver supports Silicon Labs 5351A/B/C programmable clock
> >> generators.
> >> @@ -139,7 +139,6 @@ config COMMON_CLK_CDCE706
> >> tristate "Clock driver for TI CDCE706 clock synthesizer"
> >> depends on I2C
> >> select REGMAP_I2C
> >> - select RATIONAL
> >> ---help---
> >> This driver supports TI CDCE706 programmable 3-PLL clock synthesizer.
> >
> > Will some kernel janitor find us if we leave the selects here? I know
> > you removed it because COMMON_CLK must be Y here and we'd always select
> > RATIONAL, but it feels better to leave it alone and actually split off
> > the basic clock types into individual configs so that the tiny kernel
> > users don't have unused code lying around. That could be future work
> > someday and then we might forget to select RATIONAL again.
>
> I'm fine with that as well. So, do I need to resend or you apply
> modified version?
There are couple of issues with arithmetics, such as we can't use
mult_frac() because of potential overflow on 32 bit kernels, so I will
resend new version.
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-31 9:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-30 18:57 [PATCH v2 0/2] clk: fractional-divider: do a clean up Andy Shevchenko
2015-03-30 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] clk: fractional-divider: switch to rational best approximation Andy Shevchenko
2015-03-31 0:32 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-03-31 7:42 ` Andy Shevchenko
2015-03-31 9:33 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2015-03-30 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] clk: fractional-divider: fix sparse warnings Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1427794383.14897.453.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox