From: Jongman Heo <jongman.heo@samsung.com>
To: Anna Schumaker <schumaker.anna@gmail.com>,
"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: Regression caused by commit 4bdc33ed ("NFSDv4.2: Add NFS v4.2 support to the NFS server")
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 04:27:37 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14287980.88031380169656788.JavaMail.weblogic@epml16> (raw)
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=euc-kr, Size: 4861 bytes --]
>
>------- Original Message -------
>
>Sender : Anna Schumaker<schumaker.anna@gmail.com>
>
>Date : 2013-09-25 22:52 (GMT+09:00)
>
>Title : Re: Regression caused by commit 4bdc33ed ("NFSDv4.2: Add NFS v4.2 support to the NFS server")
>
>
>
>Hi Jongman,
>
>Is the panic on your client or server? I don't see how the patch your
>bisect led you to could cause the problem, since all it does is expand
>the minor version array on the server. Your client doesn't have NFSD
>enabled, so this code shouldn't even be affecting it.
>
>A few questions: what is your /etc/exports on the server? What
>version of NFS are you using for nfsroot?
>
>Thanks!
>Anna
>
>On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Jongman Heo wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> My embedded development box fails to NFS-boot with NFS server which uses recent kernel.
>>
>> Using git bisect, I found it is caused by commit 4bdc33ed ("NFSDv4.2: Add NFS v4.2 support to the NFS server").
>>
>>
>> 1. dmesg (NFS boot failure case)
>>
>> ...
>> [ 2.040893] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
>> [ 2.046207] e1000: eth0 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX
>> [ 2.053570] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready
>> [ 3.055023] IP-Config: Guessing netmask 255.255.0.0
>> [ 3.059979] IP-Config: Gateway not on directly connected network.
>> [ 3.066330] Looking up port of RPC 100003/2 on 165.213.88.249
>> [ 3.074001] Looking up port of RPC 100005/1 on 165.213.88.249
>> [ 3.122878] VFS: Unable to mount root fs via NFS, trying floppy.
>> [ 3.129134] VFS: Cannot open root device "nfs" or unknown-block(2,0)
>> [ 3.135478] Please append a correct "root=" boot option; here are the available partitions:
>> [ 3.143831] 1f00 3072 mtdblock0 (driver?)
>> [ 3.148798] 1f01 64 mtdblock1 (driver?)
>> [ 3.153758] 1f02 64 mtdblock2 (driver?)
>> [ 3.158719] 1f03 64 mtdblock3 (driver?)
>> [ 3.163682] 1f04 64 mtdblock4 (driver?)
>> [ 3.168644] 1f05 64 mtdblock5 (driver?)
>> [ 3.173607] 1f06 64 mtdblock6 (driver?)
>> [ 3.178568] 0800 488386584 sda driver: sd
>> [ 3.183099] 0801 506016 sda1
>> [ 3.186927] 0802 4008217 sda2
>> [ 3.190755] 0803 483869767 sda3
>> [ 3.194584] b300 1880064 mmcblk0 driver: mmcblk
>> [ 3.199802] b301 4096 mmcblk0p1
>> [ 3.204063] b302 102400 mmcblk0p2
>> [ 3.208330] b303 4096 mmcblk0p3
>> [ 3.212594] b304 1 mmcblk0p4
>> [ 3.216855] b305 2048 mmcblk0p5
>> [ 3.221116] b306 2048 mmcblk0p6
>> [ 3.225382] b307 2048 mmcblk0p7
>> [ 3.229644] b308 4096 mmcblk0p8
>> [ 3.233906] b309 12288 mmcblk0p9
>> [ 3.238176] b30a 16384 mmcblk0p10
>> [ 3.242524] b30b 142336 mmcblk0p11
>> [ 3.246869] b30c 1572864 mmcblk0p12
>> [ 3.251219] b320 12288 mmcblk0gp1 (driver?)
>> [ 3.256272] b310 12288 mmcblk0gp0 (driver?)
>> [ 3.261320] Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(2,0)
>> [ 3.269566] Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.35 #1
>> [ 3.274776] Call Trace:
>> [ 3.277232] [<80d0db5b>] ? printk+0x1e/0x20
>> [ 3.281492] [<80d0dad1>] panic+0x65/0xd1
>> [ 3.285495] [<80eb9ce3>] mount_block_root+0x125/0x1be
>> [ 3.290631] [<809d1f6d>] ? sys_mknod+0x2d/0x30
>> [ 3.295156] [<80eb9f6d>] mount_root+0xd0/0xf2
>> [ 3.299591] [<80eba0d9>] prepare_namespace+0x14a/0x184
>> [ 3.304803] [<809c44f6>] ? sys_access+0x26/0x30
>> [ 3.309411] [<80eb9a4e>] kernel_init+0x25e/0x26e
>> [ 3.314105] [<80eb97f0>] ? kernel_init+0x0/0x26e
>> [ 3.318800] [<80903242>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x10
>>
>>
>> 2. Client (my embedded box) configuration
>> It's kernel 2.6.35 based, and has following NFS kernel configs.
>>
>> # grep NFS .config
>> CONFIG_NFS_FS=y
>> CONFIG_NFS_V3=y
>> CONFIG_NFS_V3_ACL=y
>> CONFIG_NFS_V4=y
>> # CONFIG_NFS_V4_1 is not set
>> CONFIG_ROOT_NFS=y
>> # CONFIG_NFSD is not set
>> CONFIG_NFS_ACL_SUPPORT=y
>> CONFIG_NFS_COMMON=y
>>
>>
>> 3. Server (NFSD) configuration
>> Fedora 19 + latest linus git kernel 3.12.0-rc2+ (commit 22356f44, mm: Place preemption point in do_mlockall() loop)
>>
>>
>> 4. workaround
>>
>> Reverting the commit 4bdc33ed resolves my issue, NFS boot is working then.
>> I've done git bisect, but lost the resulting bisect log due to sudden power loss :(.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Jongman Heo
>
>
>
Hi,
Please see my e-mail reply to J. Bruce Fields for the detail.
Thanks,
Jongman Heo.ÿôèº{.nÇ+·®+%Ëÿ±éݶ\x17¥wÿº{.nÇ+·¥{±þG«éÿ{ayº\x1dÊÚë,j\a¢f£¢·hïêÿêçz_è®\x03(éÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?¨èÚ&£ø§~á¶iOæ¬z·vØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?I¥
next reply other threads:[~2013-09-26 4:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-26 4:27 Jongman Heo [this message]
[not found] <42.19.15034.896B3425@epcpsbgx2.samsung.com>
2013-09-26 17:47 ` Re: Regression caused by commit 4bdc33ed ("NFSDv4.2: Add NFS v4.2 support to the NFS server") J. Bruce Fields
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-09-26 4:22 Jongman Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14287980.88031380169656788.JavaMail.weblogic@epml16 \
--to=jongman.heo@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schumaker.anna@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox