From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964993AbbD0S5a (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:57:30 -0400 Received: from queue01a.mail.zen.net.uk ([212.23.3.234]:51435 "EHLO queue01a.mail.zen.net.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964923AbbD0S51 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:57:27 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 2748 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:57:27 EDT Message-ID: <1430158296.2859.31.camel@linaro.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ARM64: add SCPI mailbox protocol, clock and CPUFreq support From: "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" To: Sudeep Holla Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liviu Dudau , Lorenzo Pieralisi Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 19:11:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1430134846-24320-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> References: <1430134846-24320-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-smarthost01b-IP: [82.69.122.217] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 12:40 +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: > Hi, > > This patch series adds support for: > 1. SCPI(System Control and Power Interface) mailbox protocol > driver. Is there a public document with the final protocol specification? I have spotted an inconsistency between driver and a draft doc I have but before commenting on things like that it would be good to have the final version of the document instead. -- Tixy