From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>,
Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@globallogic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: dmi_scan: Only honor end-of-table for 64-bit tables
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:46:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1430401580.4445.77.camel@chaos.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu-Wd0xN1ZFR4BYAPRBf2YS+NixLDQQYz6BObm8wQdg2pQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Ard,
Le Thursday 30 April 2015 à 12:37 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel a écrit :
> On 28 April 2015 at 20:41, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> wrote:
> > From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
> > Subject: firmware: dmi_scan: Only honor end-of-table for 64-bit tables
> >
> > A 32-bit entry point to a DMI table says how many structures the table
> > contains. The SMBIOS specification explicitly says that end-of-table
> > markers should be ignored if they are not actually at the end of the
> > DMI table. So only honor the end-of-table marker for tables accessed
> > through 64-bit entry points, as they do not specify a structure count.
> >
> > Fixes: fc43026278 ("dmi: add support for SMBIOS 3.0 64-bit entry point")
> > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
> > Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
> > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > --- linux-4.1-rc1.orig/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c 2015-04-28 16:39:00.845282262 +0200
> > +++ linux-4.1-rc1/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c 2015-04-28 16:47:35.092644748 +0200
> > @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static void dmi_table(u8 *buf,
> > /*
> > * 7.45 End-of-Table (Type 127) [SMBIOS reference spec v3.0.0]
>
> I wrote this comment under the assumption that type #127 was new in
> v3, but apparently it is not.
> Since you are changing the test below into something non-trivial,
> could we perhaps update the comment to explain better what goes on
> here?
Good idea, thanks for suggesting. Version 2 of the patch is coming.
> > */
> > - if (dm->type == DMI_ENTRY_END_OF_TABLE)
> > + if (!dmi_num && dm->type == DMI_ENTRY_END_OF_TABLE)
> > break;
> >
> > data += 2;
> >
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-30 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-28 18:41 [PATCH] firmware: dmi_scan: Only honor end-of-table for 64-bit tables Jean Delvare
2015-04-30 10:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-04-30 13:46 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1430401580.4445.77.camel@chaos.site \
--to=jdelvare@suse.de \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=ivan.khoronzhuk@globallogic.com \
--cc=leif.lindholm@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox