public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: "Bryan O'Donoghue" <pure.logic@nexus-software.ie>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	x86@kernel.org, dvhart@infradead.org, andy.schevchenko@gmail.com,
	boon.leong.ong@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, derek.browne@intel.com,
	josef.ahmad@intel.com, erik.nyquist@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/quark: Add Quark embedded SRAM support
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 10:44:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1430815487.3843.24.camel@x220> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430705875-6990-2-git-send-email-pure.logic@nexus-software.ie>

On Mon, 2015-05-04 at 03:17 +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/intel-quark/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-quark/Makefile

>  obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_IMR) += imr.o

(Your change to drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig now makes it possible that
imr.o will be part of a module. More on that below.)

> +obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_ESRAM) += esram.o

INTEL_ESRAM is a bool Kconfig symbol, so esram.o will never be part of a
module, right?

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-quark/esram.c

> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, esram_ids);

> +module_init(esram_init);
> +module_exit(esram_exit);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@nexus-software.ie>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Intel Embedded SRAM overlay driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL");
> +

(Trailing empty line.)

> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig

>  config INTEL_IMR
> -	bool "Intel Isolated Memory Region support"
> +	tristate "Intel Isolated Memory Region support"

It's not obvious, at least to me, why this symbol is changed to
tristate. Does that follow from the other changes?

>  	default n
>  	depends on X86_INTEL_QUARK && IOSF_MBI
>  	---help---
 
> +config INTEL_ESRAM
> +	bool "Intel Embedded SRAM (eSRAM) support"

If I'm reading the corresponding Makefile change correctly, esram.o will
never be part of a module. But esram.c is added with some module
specific boilerplate. (Note, again, that I'm not sure whether
KBUILD_MODNAME is module specific.)

Was your intention perhaps to make this a tristate symbol?

> +	default n
> +	depends on X86_INTEL_QUARK && IOSF_MBI
> +	select GENERIC_ALLOCATOR
> +	---help---
> +	  This options provides an API to allocate memory from Embedded SRAM
> +	  (eSRAM) present on Quark X1000 SoC processors.
> +	  eSRAM is a 512 KiB block of low-latency SRAM organized as
> +	  128 * 4 KiB pages or as one 512 KiB chunk of memory. This driver
> +	  enables eSRAM in per-page overlay mode and provides a gen_pool
> +	  allocator which allows allocation of memory from the eSRAM pool.
> +
> +	  If you are running on a Galileo/Quark say Y here.

Thanks,


Paul Bolle


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-05  8:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-04  2:17 [PATCH 0/2] x86/quark: Add eSRAM driver and test code Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-05-04  2:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/quark: Add Quark embedded SRAM support Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-05-04 15:00   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-05 13:48     ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-05-05 20:07       ` Darren Hart
2015-05-05 22:19     ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-05-05  8:44   ` Paul Bolle [this message]
2015-05-05 13:03     ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-05-06  9:58   ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-06 15:46     ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-05-04  2:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/quark: Add Quark embedded SRAM self-test Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-05-05  8:34   ` Paul Bolle
2015-05-06 10:02   ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-06 14:27     ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-05-06 10:08   ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-06  9:52 ` [PATCH 0/2] x86/quark: Add eSRAM driver and test code Ingo Molnar
2015-05-06 15:27   ` Bryan O'Donoghue

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1430815487.3843.24.camel@x220 \
    --to=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
    --cc=andy.schevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=boon.leong.ong@intel.com \
    --cc=derek.browne@intel.com \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=erik.nyquist@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=josef.ahmad@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pure.logic@nexus-software.ie \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox