From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>,
Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@codeaurora.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] clkdev: change prototype of clk_register_clkdev()
Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 15:34:09 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1430915649.28073.6.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150506110956.GN2067@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 12:09 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 01:24:12PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Since clk_register_clkdev() is exported for modules the caller should get a
> > pointer to the allocated resources. Otherwise the memory leak is guaranteed on
> > the ->remove() stage.
>
> clk_register_clkdev() is there to assist mass clock registrations, which
> typically happen in platform code. It's there to simplify the "I need
> to register this clock which I'm not going to release again".
>
> I don't see any of these locations trying to unregister their clk from
> clkdev, so I doubt this patch is needed.
We are doing the driver which will use this (as I mentioned in the cover
letter).
>
> Where a module wants to remove its clk from clkdev, it should register
> its clk with clkdev_create() and remove it with clkdev_drop().
>
You are talking about something in the wild? I can't find
clkdev_create() neither in current clk.git nor in linux-next.git.
Otherwise we have (and there are places with same case) to use
clkdev_alloc() + clkdev_add() which is few lines more of code.
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-06 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-06 10:24 [PATCH v4 0/1] clkdev: prevent potential memory leak when used in modules Andy Shevchenko
2015-05-06 10:24 ` [PATCH v4 1/1] clkdev: change prototype of clk_register_clkdev() Andy Shevchenko
2015-05-06 11:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-06 12:34 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2015-05-06 12:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-08 11:01 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1430915649.28073.6.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bryanh@codeaurora.org \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox