From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752017AbbEGDWl (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2015 23:22:41 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com ([209.85.212.172]:36463 "EHLO mail-wi0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750900AbbEGDWj (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2015 23:22:39 -0400 Message-ID: <1430968960.2955.45.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [KERNEL BUG] do_timer/tick_handover_do_timer 3.10.17 From: Mike Galbraith To: pawandeep oza Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, malayasen rout , oza@broadcom.com Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 05:22:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 22:57 +0530, pawandeep oza wrote: > but when say core0 has raised BUG.. ... > what is the right way to approach this problem Look at the spot BUG() printed? BUG() means "Way to go slick, the code you fed me (file:line) is toxic. Have a nice day, your ex-buddy core0". -Mike