From: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
To: wim@iguana.be, linux@roeck-us.net
Cc: jszhang@marvell.com, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] watchdog: dw_wdt: No need for a spinlock
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 21:27:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1431059265-9204-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org> (raw)
Right now the dw_wdt uses a spinlock to protect dw_wdt_open(). The
problem is that while holding the spinlock we call:
-> dw_wdt_set_top()
-> dw_wdt_top_in_seconds()
-> clk_get_rate()
-> clk_prepare_lock()
-> mutex_lock()
Locking a mutex while holding a spinlock is not allowed and leads to
warnings like "BUG: spinlock wrong CPU on CPU#1", among other
problems.
There's no reason to use a spinlock. Only dw_wdt_open() was protected
and the test_and_set_bit() at the start of that function protects us
anyway.
Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
---
Changes in v2:
- Don't switch to mutex; just don't use spinlock at all as per Dmitry
drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c | 7 -------
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
index d0bb949..a284abd 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
@@ -35,7 +35,6 @@
#include <linux/pm.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/reboot.h>
-#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/timer.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
#include <linux/watchdog.h>
@@ -61,7 +60,6 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(nowayout, "Watchdog cannot be stopped once started "
#define WDT_TIMEOUT (HZ / 2)
static struct {
- spinlock_t lock;
void __iomem *regs;
struct clk *clk;
unsigned long in_use;
@@ -177,7 +175,6 @@ static int dw_wdt_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
/* Make sure we don't get unloaded. */
__module_get(THIS_MODULE);
- spin_lock(&dw_wdt.lock);
if (!dw_wdt_is_enabled()) {
/*
* The watchdog is not currently enabled. Set the timeout to
@@ -190,8 +187,6 @@ static int dw_wdt_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
dw_wdt_set_next_heartbeat();
- spin_unlock(&dw_wdt.lock);
-
return nonseekable_open(inode, filp);
}
@@ -348,8 +343,6 @@ static int dw_wdt_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (ret)
return ret;
- spin_lock_init(&dw_wdt.lock);
-
ret = misc_register(&dw_wdt_miscdev);
if (ret)
goto out_disable_clk;
--
2.2.0.rc0.207.ga3a616c
next reply other threads:[~2015-05-08 4:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-08 4:27 Doug Anderson [this message]
2015-05-08 4:27 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] watchdog: dw_wdt: keepalive the watchdog at write time Doug Anderson
2015-05-08 5:24 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2015-05-08 4:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] watchdog: dw_wdt: No need for a spinlock Guenter Roeck
2015-05-08 5:01 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-05-08 5:23 ` Dmitry Torokhov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1431059265-9204-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org \
--to=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=jszhang@marvell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox